2016
DOI: 10.3390/s16101638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodological Comparison between a Novel Automatic Sampling System for Gas Chromatography versus Photoacoustic Spectroscopy for Measuring Greenhouse Gas Emissions under Field Conditions

Abstract: Trace gases such as nitrous oxide (N2O), methane (CH4), and carbon dioxide (CO2) are climate-related gases, and their emissions from agricultural livestock barns are not negligible. Conventional measurement systems in the field (Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR); photoacoustic system (PAS)) are not sufficiently sensitive to N2O. Laser-based measurement systems are highly accurate, but they are very expensive to purchase and maintain. One cost-effective alternative is gas chromatography (GC) with e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concentrations of NH 3 , CH 4 and CO 2 were measured continuously with a photoacoustic Multi-Gas Analyser 1412 and a Multiplexer 1303 (LumaSense Technologies SA, Ballerup, Denmark) via infrared spectroscopy as described by [ 32 ]. The accuracy of the Multi-Gas Analyser involved 2–3% absolute deviation of concentrations, and the detection limits given by the calibration chart of the manufacturer were as follows: 0.14 mg/m 3 NH 3 , 0.27 mg/m 3 CH 4 , and 9.34 mg/m 3 CO 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentrations of NH 3 , CH 4 and CO 2 were measured continuously with a photoacoustic Multi-Gas Analyser 1412 and a Multiplexer 1303 (LumaSense Technologies SA, Ballerup, Denmark) via infrared spectroscopy as described by [ 32 ]. The accuracy of the Multi-Gas Analyser involved 2–3% absolute deviation of concentrations, and the detection limits given by the calibration chart of the manufacturer were as follows: 0.14 mg/m 3 NH 3 , 0.27 mg/m 3 CH 4 , and 9.34 mg/m 3 CO 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ammonia concentration values were measured using a photoacoustic multi-gas monitor (INNOVA 1412 in combination with multiplexer 1309, LumaSense Technologies A/S, Ballerup, DK; cf. [15]. Odour samples taken on site were analysed at the olfactometry laboratory (n = 4 samples per day) according to DIN EN 13725:2003-07 [16] test scheme using an olfactometer (TO 8, ECOMA, Weyhe-Dreye, Germany).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barn I was equipped with a Multi-Gas-Monitor Innova 1314 and a Multipoint-Sampler 1309 (LumaSense Technologies A/S, Ballerup, Denmark), while Barn II and III were equipped with a Multi-Gas-Monitor Innova 1412i and a Multipoint-Sampler 1409. The measurement was carried out using the methodology as described by [36,37]. The measurement of fresh and exhaust air was done continuously for the control group and experimental groups, respectively.…”
Section: Gas Sampling and Emissions Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%