2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodological Bias Can Lead the Cochrane Collaboration to Irrelevance in Public Health Decision-Making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a need to measure these benefits using robust epidemiological methods [63], while avoiding the biases such studies can entail [64, 65], in order to provide adequate evidence to policy makers. Nevertheless, with hundreds of millions of children still at risk of worm infection worldwide, providing free school-based deworming treatment is an easy policy “win” for health, education, and development.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a need to measure these benefits using robust epidemiological methods [63], while avoiding the biases such studies can entail [64, 65], in order to provide adequate evidence to policy makers. Nevertheless, with hundreds of millions of children still at risk of worm infection worldwide, providing free school-based deworming treatment is an easy policy “win” for health, education, and development.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26-30 For example, studies may be underpowered to detect a meaningful effect and relevant health outcomes may not be realized within the short timeframe of most trials. Furthermore, children may have high rates of reinfection in school-based programmes that limits improvements to health, but this could be overcome with community-wide treatment strategies.…”
Section: Preventive Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This recommendation is based on the fact that infections of moderate/heavy intensity are generally not found at prevalences lower than 20% [45]. Many argue that in order to evaluate the impact of deworming interventions, analyses must be restricted to those who were infected at baseline, and thus could benefit from treatment [30]. However, new trends in ethics guidelines prevent the detection of STH infection at baseline and subsequent randomization of infected individuals to placebo control groups, thereby withholding treatment from those in need.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As uninfected individuals are not expected to benefit from deworming treatment, experts have argued that deworming trials should restrict data analyses to those participants who test positive for STH infection at baseline, so as to best estimate the effectiveness of treatment [30]. In order to obtain a baseline measure of STH infection in the total trial population, all women were asked to provide a stool specimen during the first stage of recruitment (i.e., in participants’ homes during pregnancy).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%