Methodological basics and evolution of the Belgian health interview survey 1997–2008

Abstract

BackgroundThe Belgian Health Interview Survey (BHIS) is organised every 4 to 5 years and collects health information from around 10,000 individuals in a face-to-face setting. This manuscript describes the methodological choices made in the sampling design, the outcomes of the previous surveys in terms of participation rates and achieved targets and the factors to be accounted for in data-analysis.MethodsThe BHIS targets all persons residing in Belgium with no restrictions on age or nationality. Trimestral copies of the National Population Registry are used as the sampling frame. To select the respondents, a multistage sampling design is applied involving a geographical stratification, a selection of clusters, a selection of households within each cluster and a selection of respondents within each household. Using matched substitution of non-participating households assures the realisation of the predefined net-sample.ResultsFor each BHIS the required number of participants is achieved, including the years when an oversampling of provinces and of the elderly occurred. The sampling design guarantees that the survey is implemented in large cities as well as in small municipalities. A growing problem is related to the sampling frame: it is increasingly subject of deterioration, especially in the Brussels-Capital Region.ConclusionsThe methodological approach developed for the first BHIS proves to be accurate and was kept nearly unchanged throughout the following surveys. Fieldwork substitution contributes to a considerable extent to the success of the fieldwork but yields in higher percentages of non-participation. The sampling design requires special attention when analysing the data: the unequal selection probability, e.g. due to the non-proportional stratification at the regional level, necessitates the use of weights. The BHIS is progressively embedded in the European Health Survey, a process that doesn’t jeopardise the comparability of the Belgian results throughout time.

Do teachers have worse mental health? Review of the existing comparative research and results from the Belgian Health Interview Survey

“…A multistage sampling design is used, which involves geographical stratification (regions, municipalities), a selection of households within each cluster, and a selection of respondents within each household. The methodology has been described in detail by Demarest et al (2013).…”

The role of socioeconomic status in the relationship between detention and self-rated health among prison detainees in Belgium

“…For this study, only data from the last wave (2013) were used in which 14549 households were invited to participate (response rate of 57.1%). Additional and detailed information about the development of the questionnaires and study protocol is published elsewhere (Charafeddine et al., ; Demarest et al., ). For this study, only participants who were older than 18 were included, in order to have comparable age limits to the prison population ( N = 46,961).…”

Fat-soluble vitamin intake from the consumption of food, fortified food and supplements: design and methods of the Belgian VITADEK study

“…Infants, toddlers and lactating women were selected according to a multistage proportionate-to-size stratified sampling design [16]. First, a geographical stratification by province was executed, followed by a selection of municipalities and CHCCs within each province, and finally by the recruitment of 10 subjects per target group within each CHCC.…”