2013
DOI: 10.3354/cr01135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodological aspects of the validation of decadal predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it is difficult to obtain robust forecast quality estimates with such limited samples2544, this paper only discusses results from those systems with a higher frequency of start dates. However, a systematic comparison of the results with both samples suggests that a 5-year interval sampling allows estimating the level of skill, although the estimates contain spurious maxima along the forecast time due to the poor sampling of the start dates25.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is difficult to obtain robust forecast quality estimates with such limited samples2544, this paper only discusses results from those systems with a higher frequency of start dates. However, a systematic comparison of the results with both samples suggests that a 5-year interval sampling allows estimating the level of skill, although the estimates contain spurious maxima along the forecast time due to the poor sampling of the start dates25.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, while a sufficient amount of verification data is, at least in principle, available for the validation of short‐term weather forecasts, sample sizes get smaller as we move to long lead‐times of several months or even years. The situation gets even more complicated for the recently evolving field of decadal forecasting, where sample sizes are so small that a classical verification may not be feasible at the present time (Mason, ; Gangsto et al ., ).…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most appropriate way to achieve this, especially for regional predictions, is a research question, and several methods could be considered (e.g. Gangstø et al, 2013;Kruschke et al, 2015).…”
Section: Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%