Methodological and Ethical Considerations when Conducting Qualitative Interview Research With Healthcare Professionals: Reflections and Recommendations as a Result of a Pandemic

Abstract

The impacts of healthcare professionals (HCPs) being research participants are often neglected. As professionals, they tend to be perceived as ‘immune’ to many negative effects of sharing their experiences. However, in the context of an ongoing global pandemic such as COVID-19, these assumptions can be clearly challenged. This article draws on researchers’ experiences of conducting single and longitudinal qualitative interviews with HCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe during 2020. Reflecting on the methodological and ethical implications of doing such research during a pandemic allows researchers to surface assumptions about and question categories of ‘vulnerability’ and ‘sensitivity’. We explore these categories in relation to three issues we have identified: (i) Blurred boundaries in researcher-participant relationships; (ii) Interviews as spaces to process experiences; and (iii) Motivations to conduct and participate in research. We demonstrate that qualitative interviews during a pandemic are embedded in sense-making processes for both the interviewer and participant, and as such may play an important role in coping and resilience. We therefore argue for ethically active research that critically engages with the concepts of ‘vulnerability’ and ‘sensitivity’, and underpinning assumptions, in context over time throughout the research process for current and future research with HCPs and other groups beyond pandemic situations. We thus aim to prepare researchers for managing these potential facets during the research process. We conclude with practical implications for managing emerging ethical tensions, methodological challenges and the wide-ranging possibilities and responsibilities for research with HCPs, urging researchers to consider the issues in advance.

Study of Educational Trajectories Through Biograms and Semantic Exploration, an Approach to Narrative Studies

“…The narrative research approached from a perspective similar to the one presented here goes deeper than those reviewed in order to carry out the analysis. One of the aims of narrative research is to delve deeper into the experiences of the subjects (Pilbeam et al, 2022). This is achieved with greater success if the analysis is carried out systematically and with the support of tools with these characteristics.…”

“…We can observe how through narrative research, “life stories make it possible to track down how the narrators reassemble the bits and pieces of their past life and weave them into meaningful trajectories” (Törrönen, 2022, p. 3). Narrative inquiry becomes a space of deepening the different experiences that shape these trajectories of the students (Karnieli-Miller et al, 2018; Pilbeam et al, 2022).…”

Understanding the Experiences of Medical Interpreters in Palliative Care: An Exploration of Measurement Tools

“…Medical interpreters are not the typical subject of palliative care research; however, the nature of their work warrants consideration of ethical issues that pertain to research with this specific group of professionals. For example, medical interpreters may experience emotional burden when participating in palliative care encounters, so it is important to consider the concepts of vulnerability and sensitivity (Pilbeam et al, 2022). Interpreters not only interpret emotionally laden language, but also navigate complicated roles that can result in moral distress.…”

Community Pharmacists in Vaccines Delivery Services in Nigeria: Perspectives from Stakeholders and Implications for Policy Reform

“…They were further assured of their safety throughout the process. Having given the required information about the procedure, their consents were also obtained before the interview recordings were made and autonomy was also ensured as the participants were allowed to choose their preferred interview method, either written questions forwarded to their emails or face-to-face verbal interviews [33]. All forms of sensitive issues that may introduce a con ict of interest were avoided [34].…”