2019
DOI: 10.5194/amt-2019-21
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method to retrieve cloud condensation nuclei number concentrations using lidar measurements

Abstract: Abstract. Determination of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) number concentrations at cloud base is important to constrain aerosol-cloud interactions. A new method to retrieve CCN number concentrations using backscatter and extinction profiles from multiwavelength Raman lidars is proposed. The method implements hygroscopic enhancements of backscatter/extinction with relative humidity to derive dry backscatter/extinction and humidogram parameters. Humidogram parameters, Ångström exponents, and lidar extinction-to… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If only data with an FMF above 0.6 are considered (blue dots in Figure 2), a valid relationship can be found between δ p and the rebound fraction. It has been reported that the backscatter properties at 532 nm contain mainly information for large particles 36 (over 60% of information is contributed by particles with dry diameters greater than 400 nm, and over 80% is contributed by particles with dry diameters greater than 300 nm). Therefore, we examined only the relationship between δ p and the rebound fraction for 400 nm particles.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If only data with an FMF above 0.6 are considered (blue dots in Figure 2), a valid relationship can be found between δ p and the rebound fraction. It has been reported that the backscatter properties at 532 nm contain mainly information for large particles 36 (over 60% of information is contributed by particles with dry diameters greater than 400 nm, and over 80% is contributed by particles with dry diameters greater than 300 nm). Therefore, we examined only the relationship between δ p and the rebound fraction for 400 nm particles.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cloud microphysical relevant parameters such as CCN and INP number concentrations can be also estimated by means of lidar observations (Andreae, 2009;Ghan et al, 2006;Mamouri & Ansmann, 2017& 2015Tan et al, 2019). To this end, these calculations are accompanied with large uncertainties linked to both lidar related retrieval errors and errors introduced by the methodologies themselves (Ansmann et al, 2019;Tan et al, 2019). In fact, uncertainties to the retrieved CCN number concentration amounts to 50-200 % and regarding the INP number concentrations up to a factor of 3 higher than CCN retrievals, has been determined (Ansmann et al, 2019).…”
Section: Microphysical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%