2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2023.118222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method of soil-elastoplastic DEM parameter calibration based on recurrent neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhou and other scholars 5,59,60 utilized neural networks to train the relationships between microscopic and macroscopic parameters, achieving calibration. They contend that the non-linear processing capabilities of neural networks are highly effective, offering greater precision than the DOE method when handling data.…”
Section: Machine Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou and other scholars 5,59,60 utilized neural networks to train the relationships between microscopic and macroscopic parameters, achieving calibration. They contend that the non-linear processing capabilities of neural networks are highly effective, offering greater precision than the DOE method when handling data.…”
Section: Machine Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the design of experiments method, machine learning methods can more efficiently handle high-dimensional and nonlinear issues. Various machine learning methods have been utilized by researchers to address parameter calibration issues, including random forest method 44 , 56 , support vector machine method 44 , 56 , Bayesian filtering method 110 113 , and neural network method 30 , 42 , 61 , 95 , 114 .…”
Section: Review Of Calibration Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural networks can effectively model complicated nonlinear relationships and exhibit strong adaptive learning capabilities. Long et al employed neural networks for parameter calibration, leveraging a dataset consisting of 270 observations, and the result demonstrated a substantial improvement of approximately 50% in predictive accuracy compared to the traditional design of experiments approach 114 .…”
Section: Review Of Calibration Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the same stacking angle was reached, the relative error of non-standard ball shapes was smaller than that of standard ball shapes. Long et al [13] considered the particle size distribution of soil particles when generating particles and adjusted the parameters of the soil EEPA model to keep the average accuracy at 80%. In summary, although there have been extensive studies on the calibration between soil and contact parts, there are few studies on the calibration between winderoded soil and contact parts in desert areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%