2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf02983401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method of setting Nozzle intervals at the finishing scale breaker

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An experimental study confirmed that having neighboring jets which collide with each other can significantly reduce descaling performance [10] and significantly increase cooling [4]. Industrial descaling units usually have nozzles rotated by offset angle β set to 15° (see Figure 1 right) to avoid the water jets colliding before the water hits the descaled surface [5,7,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. The only exception are patents [33,34] where the offset angle is set to 0° but the configurations produce two discontinuous lines trying to avoid problem in overlap area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An experimental study confirmed that having neighboring jets which collide with each other can significantly reduce descaling performance [10] and significantly increase cooling [4]. Industrial descaling units usually have nozzles rotated by offset angle β set to 15° (see Figure 1 right) to avoid the water jets colliding before the water hits the descaled surface [5,7,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. The only exception are patents [33,34] where the offset angle is set to 0° but the configurations produce two discontinuous lines trying to avoid problem in overlap area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The most crucial factors that affect the process can be divided into mechanical effects and thermal effects [3,4]. The dominant parameter is impact pressure, influencing both mechanical and thermal action [5,6]. The impact pressure depends on nozzle feeding pressure, nozzle quality and nozzle standoff from the descaled surface [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Configurations C1 and C2 simulated a very wide washout area with a smooth pressure reduction. The configurations have an offset angle of 15 • , which is also commonly used in the industry [28,29].…”
Section: First and Second Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are 1) spray angle α (acting in cross width direction to DR) (generally between 15-45 o ) 2) spray thickness (or depth) angle φ (parallel to direction of rolling DR) (generally between 1.5 and 3 o , but value not quoted by manufacturer despite its criticality) 3) nozzle twist angle γ (deviation from cross width direction) (generally 15 ο ) 4) lead or rake angle β (inclination from DR, usually between 0 and 15 o , max 30 o ). The spray distance H can be increased H(+) or decreased H (-) depending on the lead (rake) and offset (or twist) angle interaction [10]. It can be observed that geometrically the standoff decreases at left of nozzle (assuming positive offset and rake) and increases at right end side from nozzle orifice centre (or COG of imprint) with ever increasing rake and offset (or twist) angle affecting also the spray width.…”
Section: Analytical Calculation Of Key Descalability Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimisation using NSGAII was also performed to output optimum set-up based on IP and overlap target (not shown). It can be observed that in view of large increase in surface fracture energy, criteria of equations (10,11) based on brittle fracture cannot be satisfied, except at low temperature where γFeO ~3-4J/m 2 . Pareto plots (IP, descaling energy, overlap, etc.)…”
Section: Study Of Influence Of Thermal Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%