2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2017.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method of particular solutions using polynomial basis functions for the simulation of plate bending vibration problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As one of them, the meshless methods including the wave-based method [14][15] , the boundary node method [16][17] , and the method of fundamental solutions [18][19] have been all developed for plate bending problems to a certain extent. The above methods seek the approximations with the expansion functions to satisfy the governing equations and then obtain the unknown weight parameters by requiring the approximations satisfying the given boundary conditions [20] . It is difficult to solve the problems with complex boundary conditions, such as Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As one of them, the meshless methods including the wave-based method [14][15] , the boundary node method [16][17] , and the method of fundamental solutions [18][19] have been all developed for plate bending problems to a certain extent. The above methods seek the approximations with the expansion functions to satisfy the governing equations and then obtain the unknown weight parameters by requiring the approximations satisfying the given boundary conditions [20] . It is difficult to solve the problems with complex boundary conditions, such as Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the radial basis functions (RBFs) are more successful to find the particular solutions for some PDEs [22][23] ; however, the RBFs cannot solve the optimization problem of shape parameters well [22,25] . Additionally, although the particular solutions based on Chebyshey polynomials can avoid such difficulties and simultaneously possess relatively high accuracy [26][27] , there is an obvious disadvantage in using Chebyshey polynomials as basis functions, i.e., the forcing term of the corresponding differential equation needs to be smoothly extendable to the exterior of the solution domain in the case of irregular domains [20,25] , and the selection of the corresponding collocation points at this time must be treated specially. Recently, a novel method to derive the particular solutions to a PDE by using the standard polynomial basis functions was presented [25] , where the collocation points could be selected arbitrarily inside the solution domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several numerical examples were conducted and compared with those from other approaches. Later, Lin et al [42] presented an improved polynomial expansion method for solving plate bending vibration problems. In order to alleviate the conditioning of the matrix, the multiple-scale method was also employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some RBFs, it is difficult to obtain the optimal shape parameters, such as the multiquadric radial basis functions (MQ-RBFs) [29] and the Gaussian radial basis functions [30,31], which is crucial to the accuracy of the numerical algorithms. What's worse, the coefficient matrix can be highly ill-conditioned for large scale problems [32]. In order to overcome these drawbacks, researchers come up with the localized approaches including the compactly supported RBFs, the localized RBFs collocation method, the local radial basis functions based differential quadrature collocation method [33,34], and the localized method of approximate particular solutions (LMAPS) [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%