2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2018.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method of determining loosely bound compounds of heavy metals in the soil

Abstract: Graphical abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total content of HMs in soils was determined by the X-ray fluorescence method. The mobile compounds of the element were transferred into the solution from the soil by parallel extractions using the reagents following the method suggested by Minkina et al: 31 (1) 1 N ammonium acetate buffer (NH 4 Ac) pH 4.8 (soil/solution ratio = 1:5, extraction time: 18 h), which transfers exchangeable forms of metals characterizing their actual mobility into the solution; and (2) a 1% solution of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in NH 4 Ac pH 4.8 (soil/solution ratio = 1:5, extraction time: 18 h), which presumably transfers relatively weak metal complexes of metals into the solution along with their exchangeable forms.…”
Section: Objects and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total content of HMs in soils was determined by the X-ray fluorescence method. The mobile compounds of the element were transferred into the solution from the soil by parallel extractions using the reagents following the method suggested by Minkina et al: 31 (1) 1 N ammonium acetate buffer (NH 4 Ac) pH 4.8 (soil/solution ratio = 1:5, extraction time: 18 h), which transfers exchangeable forms of metals characterizing their actual mobility into the solution; and (2) a 1% solution of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in NH 4 Ac pH 4.8 (soil/solution ratio = 1:5, extraction time: 18 h), which presumably transfers relatively weak metal complexes of metals into the solution along with their exchangeable forms.…”
Section: Objects and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of the mechanisms of Cu immobilization in Fluvisol after the introduction of a carbonaceous sorbent was carried out using a combined fractionation scheme (Minkina et al, 2013), which makes possible to determine the composition of loosely (LB) and strongly bound (SB) HM-containing compounds in details, comparing other methods and follow the dynamics of the bound strength of metals and main soil components. This scheme is based on a combination of the results obtained by the Tessier method (Tessier et al, 1979) and parallel extractions (Minkina et al, 2018). The content of metal in fractions included in LB and SB groups of compounds was determined by the analytical and computational methods (Figure 3).…”
Section: Results Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AAB with a pH of 7.0 is used to determine the content of mobile metal forms in most of the international protocols [17,30,31]. At the same time, the technique of extracting with AAB at pH of 4.65-4.8 is conventional in Russian soil science [12,14]. Thus, we conducted the AAB extraction of elements in the wide pH range (3.7-7.8) and studied the effect of pH on the content of metals in the industrially polluted peat soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, AAB extracts more metals than ammonium and acetic acid solutions separately. This feature ensures that not only mobile, but also weakly sorbed metal compounds, can be extracted during the soil treatment with AAB [14].…”
Section: Metal Fraction Extractant Mechanism Of Extraction Migration mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation