2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2020.0785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method of amplitude data recovery in PMU measurements that considers synchronisation errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature [22] introduces an optimized metadata recovery scheme that can retrieve tables faster than the contemporary scheme, which is corroborated by the simulation results, which confirms that the efficiency of the method is superior to other schemes. Literature [23] designed a method to recover missing or anomalous magnitude data (i.e., active power, reactive power, positive sequence current, and voltage magnitude) from PMU measurements based on historical PMU data obtained from both ends of the line. Simulation examples and measured data are used to demonstrate the feasibility and practicality of the method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature [22] introduces an optimized metadata recovery scheme that can retrieve tables faster than the contemporary scheme, which is corroborated by the simulation results, which confirms that the efficiency of the method is superior to other schemes. Literature [23] designed a method to recover missing or anomalous magnitude data (i.e., active power, reactive power, positive sequence current, and voltage magnitude) from PMU measurements based on historical PMU data obtained from both ends of the line. Simulation examples and measured data are used to demonstrate the feasibility and practicality of the method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the methods of Category 1, as the voltage and current phasors can be provided by PMU [6], the linear equations based on least square estimation to identify ParTL can be established in [7–10], which work well even if there are measurement noise in PMU data. However, since bad data and synchronization errors may be introduced by the data loss [11, 12], gross error [13], manipulation attacks [14, 15], and time stamp shift [16, 17], the results with field data may contain errors [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the methods based on live measurements have attracted a lot of attention, they could be generally classified into three categories according to the data source, that is, Category 1: methods based on phasor measurement unit (PMU) measurements; Category 2: For the methods of Category 1, as the voltage and current phasors can be provided by PMU [6], the linear equations based on least square estimation to identify ParTL can be established in [7][8][9][10], which work well even if there are measurement noise in PMU data. However, since bad data and synchronization errors may be introduced by the data loss [11,12], gross error [13], manipulation attacks [14,15], and time stamp shift [16,17], the results with field data may contain errors [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, its performance will deteriorate when data losses occur. Clustering analysis such as subspace clustering [21] and the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) algorithm [22,23] can also be used to detect outliers and restore them to their actual values efficiently. However, as most existing methods, clustering analysis is not good at recovering PMU measurements with low SNRs, either.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%