Method Matters: Effect of Purification Technology on Neutrophil Phenotype and Function

Abstract

Neutrophils are the most abundant leukocytes in human blood and the first cells responding to infection and injury. Due to their limited ex vivo lifespan and the impossibility to cryopreserve or expand them in vitro, neutrophils need to be purified from fresh blood for immediate use in experiments. Importantly, neutrophil purification methods may artificially modify the phenotype and functional characteristics of the isolated cells. The aim of this study was to expose the effects of ‘classical’ density-gradient purification versus the more expensive but faster immunomagnetic isolation on neutrophil phenotype and functionality. We found that in the absence of inflammatory stimuli, density-gradient-derived neutrophils showed increased polarization responses as well as enhanced release of reactive oxygen species (ROS), neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and granular proteins compared to cells derived from immunomagnetic isolation, which yields mostly quiescent neutrophils. Upon exposure to pro-inflammatory mediators, immunomagnetic isolation-derived neutrophils were significantly more responsive in polarization, ROS production, phagocytosis, NETosis and degranulation assays, in comparison to density-gradient-derived cells. We found no difference in chemotactic response in Multiscreen and under-agarose migration assays, but Boyden assays showed reduced chemotaxis of immunomagnetic isolation-derived neutrophils. Finally, we confirmed that density-gradient purification induces artificial activation of neutrophils, evidenced by e.g. higher expression of CD66b, formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) and CD35, and the appearance of a separate neutrophil population expressing surface molecules atypical for neutrophils (e.g. CXCR3, MHC-II and CD14). Based on these results, we recommend using immunomagnetic separation of neutrophils for studying neutrophil polarization, phagocytosis, ROS production, degranulation and NETosis, whereas for Boyden chemotaxis assays, the density-gradient purification is more suitable.

Structural surfaceomics reveals an AML-specific conformation of Integrin-β2 as a CAR-T therapy target

“…9b ). Analyzing granulocytes and monocytes, we did find that these cells appeared strongly positive for active integrin-β2; however, it is well known that this finding is an artifact of ex vivo activation of these cells after blood collection 48 . We reasoned that evaluating potential aITGB2 CAR-T cytotoxicity impacts versus myeloid cells would require in vivo studies, in the absence of this activation artifact.…”

The GAG-Binding Peptide MIG30 Protects against Liver Ischemia-Reperfusion in Mice

“…Human neutrophils purified by density-gradient centrifugation were used in the Ca 2+ signaling assay. For phenotypical analysis and protease release, neutrophils were purified via immunomagnetic isolation using the EasySep Direct human neutrophil isolation kit (StemCell Technologies, Cambridge, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions [ 42 ]. The ethical committee of University Hospital (UZ) Leuven approved experiments involving human neutrophils (project S58418).…”

Neutrophils in malaria: The good, the bad or the ugly?

“…However, the purification procedure can significantly influence the functional and phenotypical characteristics of the isolated neutrophils. Indeed, Blanter et al demonstrated the importance of choosing the correct methodology for the unbiased study of neutrophils in vitro 26 26–28 .…”

“…Indeed, Blanter et al demonstrated the importance of choosing the correct methodology for the unbiased study of neutrophils in vitro 26 26–28 . A high level of purity of the neutrophils is also required when performing in vitro experiments.…”

“…Indeed, Blanter et al demonstrated the importance of choosing the correct methodology for the unbiased study of neutrophils in vitro. 26 While neutrophils isolated by immunomagnetic purification retain their quiescent state, density gradient purification (Ficoll/dextran) leads to artificial neutrophil activation resulting in a lower response to stimulating agents, although the two purification methods had similar yield and purity of neutrophils. [26][27][28] A high level of purity of the neutrophils is also required when performing in vitro experiments.…”