2010
DOI: 10.1080/10255840903260818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method for the estimation of a double hinge kinematic model for the trapeziometacarpal joint using MR imaging

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a method to estimate the parameters of a double hinge model of the trapeziometacarpal joint (TMC) by MRI-based motion analysis. The model includes two non-orthogonal and non-intersecting rotation axes accounting for flexion-extension (F-E) and adduction-abduction (A-A). We evaluated the quality of the estimated model parameters in the prediction of the relative motion of the first metacarpal bone with respect to the trapezium. As a result, we obtained that: (a) the estimated location … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
20
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The locations and orientations of the extension-flexion and abduction-adduction axes we reported are consistent with those reported in previous studies [1,5,[23][24][25]. However, this study advances our understanding of CMC kinematics by demonstrating that coupling of the primary motions with internal-external rotations and translation along the screw axes are continuous functions of the direction of motion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The locations and orientations of the extension-flexion and abduction-adduction axes we reported are consistent with those reported in previous studies [1,5,[23][24][25]. However, this study advances our understanding of CMC kinematics by demonstrating that coupling of the primary motions with internal-external rotations and translation along the screw axes are continuous functions of the direction of motion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It is also admitted that both axes are not perpendicular and non-intersecting [11][12][13]. However, the experimental or theoretical support for considering such two-DoF model is not always clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Yet, a detailed analysis of in vivo 3-D kinematics of the CMC joint has not been reported to date. The existing body of literature is based on cadaver studies [13,15,17,26], skin marker-based studies that track motion of the thumb, but not the trapezium [4,6,9,18,19,21,31], or single-subject imaging studies whose purpose has been to verify that flexion/extension and adduction/abduction are the primary degrees of freedom at the CMC joint [3,7]. Elucidation of OA pathogenesis requires quantitative methods capable of determining both bone rotations (osteokinematics) and articular surface translations (arthrokinematics) and large samples from different demographic groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%