Fracture surface analysis is of utmost importance with respect to structural integrity of metallic materials. This especially holds true for additive manufactured materials. Despite an increasing trend of automatization of testing methods, the analyzation and classification of fatigue fracture surface images is commonly done manually by experts. Although this leads to correct results in most cases, it has several disadvantages, e.g., the need of a huge knowledge base to interpret images correctly. Therefore, an unsupervised tool analyzing overview images of fatigue fracture surface images was developed supporting inexperienced users to identify the origin of the fracture. The tool was developed using fracture surface images of additive manufactured Ti6Al4V specimens fatigued in the High‐Cycle Fatigue regime and is based on the identification of river marks. Different recording parameters seem to have no significant influence on the tool’s results if pre‐processing settings are adapted. Moreover, it is possible to analyze images of other materials with the tool as long as the fracture surfaces contain river marks. However, special features like multiple origins or origins located in direct vicinity to the surface, e.g., caused by other increased plastic strains, require a further tool development or alternative approaches.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.