1971
DOI: 10.1038/229572a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method for Measuring the Leaf Surface Area of Complex Shoots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whenever the degree of variation is known, a conventional photo-electronic leaf area meter may be used without much loss of accuracy. In preliminary tests, employing the projected leaf area as a measure of actual leaf area was found to be superior to methods based on the weight increase of needle samples whose surfaces had been covered by an adhesive and a monolayer of glass beads (Thompson and Leyton 1971;Drew and Running 1975;Davies and Benecke 1980). When measuring projected areas, variability and error due to experimental sources were smaller and the treatment of samples was much less time consuming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whenever the degree of variation is known, a conventional photo-electronic leaf area meter may be used without much loss of accuracy. In preliminary tests, employing the projected leaf area as a measure of actual leaf area was found to be superior to methods based on the weight increase of needle samples whose surfaces had been covered by an adhesive and a monolayer of glass beads (Thompson and Leyton 1971;Drew and Running 1975;Davies and Benecke 1980). When measuring projected areas, variability and error due to experimental sources were smaller and the treatment of samples was much less time consuming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is due to the complicated geometry of needles. A variety of methods for estimating the surface area of individual needles has been developed that are based on the relationship between some leaf characteristics (for example, dry weight, volume or length) and surface area (Ohmart and Thomas 1986;Johnson 1984), the planimetric determination of the projected leaf area (Drew and Running 1975;Hager and Sterba 1985) or the weight increase after covering the surface with an adhesive and a monolayer of glass beads (Thompson andLeyton 1971, Drew andRunning 1975;Davies and Benecke 1980). Johnson (1984) has also proposed a method for measuring the volume of Pinus needles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was done only on 30-31 October (after a fumigation of 27 weeks) on 6-month-old needles (which had emerged during fumigation) at the topmost 30-35 mm of two twigs per plant. The surface area of the samples was determined with glass beads according to the method of Thompson and Leyton (1971). Temperature and humidity conditions can be seen in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shoots were then placed in plastic bags and returned to the laboratory for SLA and TLA determinations. SLA for all shoots was measured using a video area meter (Delta-T Devices, Cambridge, England), while TLA was measured using a glass bead coating technique (2,13).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%