1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(19960730)17:10<1269::aid-jcc7>3.0.co;2-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method for free‐energy calculations using iterative techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The common analysis is based on projecting MD (MC) trajectories onto a small number of coordinates using principal component analysis or calculating the populations along one or two physically significant reaction coordinates. 23,24 Differences, ∆F mn , are commonly calculated by thermodynamic integration (TI) over physical quantities such as the energy, temperature, and the specific heat 25,26 as well as nonphysical parameters [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] (free energy perturbation methods and umbrella and histogram analysis methods [35][36][37] are also included in this category, see ref 19 and references cited therein). This is a robust and highly versatile approach, which is used successfully for calculating the difference in the free energy of binding of two ligands to the active site of an enzyme.…”
Section: I1 the Role Of Free Energy In Structural Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common analysis is based on projecting MD (MC) trajectories onto a small number of coordinates using principal component analysis or calculating the populations along one or two physically significant reaction coordinates. 23,24 Differences, ∆F mn , are commonly calculated by thermodynamic integration (TI) over physical quantities such as the energy, temperature, and the specific heat 25,26 as well as nonphysical parameters [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] (free energy perturbation methods and umbrella and histogram analysis methods [35][36][37] are also included in this category, see ref 19 and references cited therein). This is a robust and highly versatile approach, which is used successfully for calculating the difference in the free energy of binding of two ligands to the active site of an enzyme.…”
Section: I1 the Role Of Free Energy In Structural Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can significantly increase the rate of achieving convergence. Kumar et al devised a weighted histogram analysis method (WHAM) [25][26][27][28][29] that allowed optimal weighting of previous simulation data by recasting the Ferrenberg-Swendsen multiple histogram equations [30]. The histograms for differently biased simulations were used and combined into an unbiased distribution by applying the correct weights calculated from the WHAM equations.…”
Section: Ferrenberg-swendsen Multiple Histogram Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each step in the iterative process several biased simulations are run and on completing each set of biased simulations all the biased population distributions are combined with the current and previous iterations using computed weighting factors to yield the best unbiased probability distribution, p k . This procedure is commonly known as the Weighted Histogram Analysis Method (WHAM) [28,29,32] where…”
Section: Ferrenberg-swendsen Multiple Histogram Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main problem with these algorithms, however, is the non-trivial determination of the different multicanonical weight factors by an iterative process involving short trial simulations. For complex systems this procedure can be very tedious and attempts have been made to accelerate convergence of the iterative process (Berg and Celik 1992;Kumar et al 1996;Smith and Bruce 1996;Hansmann 1997;Bartels and Karplus 1998).…”
Section: Replica Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%