2007
DOI: 10.1117/12.708522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method for extracting the aorta from 3D CT images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first classification stage 22 out of the maximum 25 features were selected. According to the ordering in Table I those were 6, 58, 3,56,15,30,4,2,5,60,10,12,63,25,7,39,61,9,40,14,55, and 34. In the second classification stage 23 out of the maximum 25 features were selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first classification stage 22 out of the maximum 25 features were selected. According to the ordering in Table I those were 6, 58, 3,56,15,30,4,2,5,60,10,12,63,25,7,39,61,9,40,14,55, and 34. In the second classification stage 23 out of the maximum 25 features were selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a standard 3D segmentation technique based solely on edge or intensity information fails without either a good initialization or integration of a 3D shape model to limit leakage into neighboring vessels with similar Hounsfield intensity values. Most previous work [11][12][13][14] addressed these difficulties with an approach that relies on a priori shape models built from manually segmented training aorta centerlines. However, small training sets cannot represent the anatomical variabilities of aorta shapes and modeling anatomical variabilities across subjects requires a complex 3D shape model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this difficulty, most algorithms developed for non-contrast CT ([3], [4], [7], [6]) use model based approaches and need a priori models built from manually segmented training data. However, these approaches might fail since they have limited flexibility to capture variabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%