1999
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/112.5.721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method Comparison of Automated Systems for the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with these findings, in the present study, LSRB measurements with the automated TEST 1 analyzer did not differ significantly from measurements using manual and automated Westergren (SRS 100) methods. The bias, agreement limits and correlations found for LSRB measurements by TEST 1 were all comparable to those found by other authors (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Furthermore, TEST 1 LSRB values were also strongly correlated with the SRS 100 method, with low bias ( Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In agreement with these findings, in the present study, LSRB measurements with the automated TEST 1 analyzer did not differ significantly from measurements using manual and automated Westergren (SRS 100) methods. The bias, agreement limits and correlations found for LSRB measurements by TEST 1 were all comparable to those found by other authors (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Furthermore, TEST 1 LSRB values were also strongly correlated with the SRS 100 method, with low bias ( Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%