2009
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/24/010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method comparison of automated matching software-assisted cone-beam CT and stereoscopic kilovoltage x-ray positional verification image-guided radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a prospective analysis

Abstract: We sought to characterize interchangeability and agreement between cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and digital stereoscopic kV x-ray (KVX) acquisition, two methods of isocenter positional verification currently used for IGRT of head and neck cancers (HNC). A cohort of 33 patients were near-simultaneously imaged by in-room KVX and CBCT. KVX and CBCT shifts were suggested using manufacturer software for the lateral (X), vertical (Y) and longitudinal (Z) dimensions. Intra-method repeatability, systematic and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(123 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In HNC treatment, immobilization masks are used to minimize interfractional variation in patient setup and motion during radiation delivery. The amount of error in daily setup in an immobilized patient has been studied previously (33‐35) and CTV‐PTV corrections necessary have been suggested previously using a variety of IGRT devices (7,36) . Interestingly, while studies have been performed to determine the effect that setup error and the movement of a patient as a whole can have on RT accuracy in HNCs, there has been a lack of analysis of the effects of independent TV/OAR/ROI motion, although this data is beginning to emerge (9,21,26,27,29) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In HNC treatment, immobilization masks are used to minimize interfractional variation in patient setup and motion during radiation delivery. The amount of error in daily setup in an immobilized patient has been studied previously (33‐35) and CTV‐PTV corrections necessary have been suggested previously using a variety of IGRT devices (7,36) . Interestingly, while studies have been performed to determine the effect that setup error and the movement of a patient as a whole can have on RT accuracy in HNCs, there has been a lack of analysis of the effects of independent TV/OAR/ROI motion, although this data is beginning to emerge (9,21,26,27,29) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a significant limitation of most current image‐guided radiation therapy (IGRT) systems is their reliance on a single point reference for corrective setup translations. For example, use of a single isocenter for portal imaging or an index slice or contour for cone‐beam CT data (7) has consequences in the head and neck, where target structures or organs at risk (OARs) are not necessarily fixed to bony landmarks and experience translational motion during delivery of radiation (8‐10) . Consequently, despite excellent setup, TV/OAR displacement from the isocenter may occur in a directionally distinct manner (11) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previously presented dataset consisting of a series of 100 paired measures using two distinct positional verification techniques in a series of 28 sequential head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients was utilized. As this manuscript is designed to specify a novel statistical methodology, interested readers are referred to the previous manuscript [ 50 ], wherein imaging parameters have been previously detailed. Briefly, CBCT and stereoscopic kV X-ray were acquired near-simultaneously at approximately biweekly intervals throughout a patient’s course of treatment (dependent upon the scheduling exigencies in the department) for a series of patients with head and neck cancers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, despite widespread implementation [3], quality assurance/quality improvement assessments of image-guidance systems may often be overlooked [4]. As distinct IGRT systems may provide distinct data distributions with regard to setup error [5], aggressive efforts at optimizing not only image acquisitions, but also optimizing human performance in radiotherapy tasks is a critical consideration [6]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%