2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methanotroph (Methylococcus capsulatus, Bath) bacteria meal as an alternative protein source for Japanese yellowtail, Seriola quinqueradiata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with Chen et al (2021), this study has shown the substitution of fishmeal with methanotroph bacteria meal did not affect uptake of feed nor have any other detrimental effects such as antinutritional properties or impacts on a range of immune measures. These results are in broad agreement with studies showing dietary supplementation of fishmeal with single cell protein shows no significant differences in growth and feed efficiency in fish species such as Atlantic salmon (Berge et al, 2005), Atlantic halibut (Aas et al, 2007), and Japanese yellowtail (Biswas et al, 2020). Other research on single cell protein as replacement of fishmeal in shrimp diets has shown they can be used to replace fishmeal, partially or fully, e.g., purple non-sulfur bacteria (Chumpol et al, 2018), C. ammoniagenes (Hamidoghli et al, 2019), and KnipBio Meal (Tlusty et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In agreement with Chen et al (2021), this study has shown the substitution of fishmeal with methanotroph bacteria meal did not affect uptake of feed nor have any other detrimental effects such as antinutritional properties or impacts on a range of immune measures. These results are in broad agreement with studies showing dietary supplementation of fishmeal with single cell protein shows no significant differences in growth and feed efficiency in fish species such as Atlantic salmon (Berge et al, 2005), Atlantic halibut (Aas et al, 2007), and Japanese yellowtail (Biswas et al, 2020). Other research on single cell protein as replacement of fishmeal in shrimp diets has shown they can be used to replace fishmeal, partially or fully, e.g., purple non-sulfur bacteria (Chumpol et al, 2018), C. ammoniagenes (Hamidoghli et al, 2019), and KnipBio Meal (Tlusty et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The harvested biomass is centrifuged, heat inactivated, and spray dried. The nutrient content and amino acid profile of methanotroph bacteria meal, FeedKind R , is comparable to traditional proteins used in animal feeds such as fishmeal (Biswas et al, 2020) and has been shown to be a viable protein source for popular species of aquaculture fish including rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and yellowtail (Seriola quinqueradiata) (Berge et al, 2005;Øverland et al, 2006;Biswas et al, 2020). An additional benefit of producing methanotroph bacteria meal, is that it utilizes less than 0.01% of the land and around 10% of blue water compared with that used to produce soy protein, enhancing its sustainability credentials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Use of methanotrophs in the industry today is limited to the generation of biomass for animal feed from single cell protein (Biswas et al 2020 ; Tsapekos et al 2020 ; Øverland et al 2010 ). Companies like Calysta and Unibio have successfully industrialized and commercialized gaseous fermentation by methanotrophs for the generation of feed biomass using a U-loop fermentor (Larsen 2002 ).…”
Section: Applications Of Native Methanotrophs and Methane Monooxygenamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, however, bacterial protein meal (BPM) with high protein content (approximately 70%) has been produced from the bacterium Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath), which utilizes methane as a carbon and energy source. Reportedly, BPM has the potential to serve as an alternative protein source for different species, although its use has yielded some mixed results (Aas et al, , 2007Aas, Hatlen, et al, 2006;Berge et al, 2005;Biswas et al, 2020;Øverland et al, 2006Perera et al, 1995;Storebakken et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%