2020
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methane Seeps and Independent Methane Plumes in the South China Sea Offshore Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
2
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming that the k CH4 measured at station PM5 during the 19 February cruise is also applicable to the 16 October sampling at this station when the near‐bottom [CH 4 ] was determined to be 695.3 nmol L −1 and the extrapolated seafloor [CH 4 ] reached 5,785 nmol L −1 (Section 4.5), the consumption rate will increase to 21.6 and 179.3 nmol L −1 d −1 , respectively. These rates are at the upper bounds of the aerobic methane oxidation rates reported for marine waters worldwide, including those affected by submarine gas seeps and anthropogenic oil spills (Mau et al., 2020 and references therein). These high methane consumption rates are also consistent with the presence of greenish bacterial mats, presumably composed of methanotrophs, on the seafloor surrounding gas‐venting pockmarks in the LSLE (Bolduc et al., 2008; Lavoie et al., 2010) and with the discovery of methane‐derived authigenic carbonate cements in sediments at certain pockmark sites in this region (Lavoie et al., 2010; Savard et al., 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Assuming that the k CH4 measured at station PM5 during the 19 February cruise is also applicable to the 16 October sampling at this station when the near‐bottom [CH 4 ] was determined to be 695.3 nmol L −1 and the extrapolated seafloor [CH 4 ] reached 5,785 nmol L −1 (Section 4.5), the consumption rate will increase to 21.6 and 179.3 nmol L −1 d −1 , respectively. These rates are at the upper bounds of the aerobic methane oxidation rates reported for marine waters worldwide, including those affected by submarine gas seeps and anthropogenic oil spills (Mau et al., 2020 and references therein). These high methane consumption rates are also consistent with the presence of greenish bacterial mats, presumably composed of methanotrophs, on the seafloor surrounding gas‐venting pockmarks in the LSLE (Bolduc et al., 2008; Lavoie et al., 2010) and with the discovery of methane‐derived authigenic carbonate cements in sediments at certain pockmark sites in this region (Lavoie et al., 2010; Savard et al., 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Similar sequences have been detected from shallow seawater (1.5 and 7 m deep) at subzero temperatures in the Arctic Ocean ( 105 ) and from shallow sediment (21 m deep) off Santa Barbara, CA ( 106 ), where the seawater temperature is governed by the cold California current. Notable detection is also reported in the water column at a depth of 32 m in the South China Sea, where the water temperature is approximately 27°C, which is above the upper limit for the growth (26°C) of M. sedimenti WF1 T ( 17 , 107 ). Despite these reports, the limited number of detections in shallow waters indicates that low temperature is likely a key factor for most Methyloprofundus species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…To date, no pure cultures of bacteria of the Hyd24‐01 clade exist; however, this clade has been reported from other methane‐rich sites, including surface sediments of Haakon Mosby Mud Volcano (Lösekann et al, 2007). The uncultured clade IheB2‐23 was first detected in the water column of the northern South China Sea (Mau et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%