2014
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-8069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methane production, nutrient digestion, ruminal fermentation, N balance, and milk production of cows fed timothy silage- or alfalfa silage-based diets

Abstract: The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of changing forage source in dairy cow diets from timothy silage (TS) to alfalfa silage (AS) on enteric CH 4 emissions, ruminal fermentation characteristics, digestion, milk production, and N balance. Nine ruminally cannulated lactating cows were used in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design (32-d period) and fed (ad libitum) a total mixed ration (TMR; forage:concentrate ratio of 60:40, dry matter basis), with the forage portion consisting of either T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(83 reference statements)
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The components of MSEP were 0.62 for error-of-central-tendency, 0.20 for error-due-to-regression, and 8.1 for error-of-disturbance. Similar results were obtained for Equations (3) and 7 4, and (c) Equation 7showing the observed methane yield against equation-predicted methane yield, for 32 individual [6], (open circles) and 67 treatment means from 16 previously published experiments [14,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] (closed circles) with 1:1 line of agreement (dashed).…”
Section: Equation Numbersupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The components of MSEP were 0.62 for error-of-central-tendency, 0.20 for error-due-to-regression, and 8.1 for error-of-disturbance. Similar results were obtained for Equations (3) and 7 4, and (c) Equation 7showing the observed methane yield against equation-predicted methane yield, for 32 individual [6], (open circles) and 67 treatment means from 16 previously published experiments [14,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] (closed circles) with 1:1 line of agreement (dashed).…”
Section: Equation Numbersupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Similar findings were reported by Filya et al [28] and Holzer et al [24]. Hassanat et al [29] report from their experimental work values of ADF, NDF, lactic acid and acetic acid similar to those determined in our experimental lucerne silages, as well as similar absence of propionic acid and butyric acid.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Hassanat et al (2014) found the ruminal concentration of branched-chain VFA increased as cows were fed higher proportions of AF silage in the diet. Also, in agreement with our results, other researchers (Haddad, 2000;Saro et al, 2014) have reported that the rumen total VFA were increased as proportions of AF were increased in diets.…”
Section: In Vitro Rumen Degradability and Fermentation Of Ss-af Silagmentioning
confidence: 95%