1988
DOI: 10.1029/jd093id02p01583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methane emissions to the troposphere from the Amazon floodplain

Abstract: Methane emissions to the troposphere from the Amazon River floodplain have been determined. In total, 94 individual flux measurements were made along a 1,700-km stretch of the river during the early falling water period of the flood cycle (July-August 1985). The overall average rate of CH 4 emission from wetlands was 390 mg CH4 m -2 d-x. Water surfaces covered by aquatic macrophytes had the highest emissions, 590 mg CH½ m -2 d -•, while emissions from flooded forests were 110 mg CH,• m -2 d -• and open lake ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
91
4
12

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
6
91
4
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Third and last, our data probably underestimate net CH 4 fluxes for the PMFB because we chose to include fluxes with strong negative values (i.e., more than −10 mg CH 4 -C m −2 day −1 ) in our calculation of mean diffusive flux rates. These observations are more negative than other values typically reported elsewhere in the tropical wetland literature (Bartlett et al, 1988(Bartlett et al, , 1990Devol et al, 1988Devol et al, , 1990Couwenberg et al, 2010). However, they represent only a small proportion of our dataset (i.e., 7 %, or only 68 out of 980 measurements), and inspection of our field notes and the data itself did not produce convincing reasons to exclude these observations (e.g., we found no evidence of irregularities during field sampling, and any chambers that showed statistically insignificant changes in concentration over time were removed during our quality control procedures).…”
Section: Relationships Between Gas Fluxes and Environmental Variablescontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third and last, our data probably underestimate net CH 4 fluxes for the PMFB because we chose to include fluxes with strong negative values (i.e., more than −10 mg CH 4 -C m −2 day −1 ) in our calculation of mean diffusive flux rates. These observations are more negative than other values typically reported elsewhere in the tropical wetland literature (Bartlett et al, 1988(Bartlett et al, , 1990Devol et al, 1988Devol et al, , 1990Couwenberg et al, 2010). However, they represent only a small proportion of our dataset (i.e., 7 %, or only 68 out of 980 measurements), and inspection of our field notes and the data itself did not produce convincing reasons to exclude these observations (e.g., we found no evidence of irregularities during field sampling, and any chambers that showed statistically insignificant changes in concentration over time were removed during our quality control procedures).…”
Section: Relationships Between Gas Fluxes and Environmental Variablescontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Diffusive CH 4 flux, averaged across all vegetation types, was 36.1 ± 3.1 mg CH 4 -C m −2 day −1 , spanning a range from −100 to 1510 mg CH 4 -C m −2 day −1 . This mean falls within the range of other diffusive fluxes observed in Indonesian peatlands (3.7-87.8 mg CH 4 -C m −2 day −1 ) (Couwenberg et al, 2010) and other Amazonian wetlands (7.1-390.0 mg CH 4 -C m −2 day −1 ) (Bartlett et al, 1988(Bartlett et al, , 1990Devol et al, 1988Devol et al, , 1990. Although the ebullition data must be treated with caution because of the sampling methodology (see below), we observed a mean net ebullition flux of 973.3 ± 161.4 mg CH 4 -C m −2 day −1 , spanning a range of 27 to 8082 mg CH 4 -C m −2 day −1 .…”
Section: Relationships Between Gas Fluxes and Environmental Variablesmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The method was described by Devol (1988Devol ( , 1990 and Bartlett et al (1988Bartlett et al ( , 1990. All the samples were taken in vegetation-free areas both in the middle of reservoir and near the edges.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em contrapartida, são habitats favoráveis à reprodução de vetores de doenças de veiculação hídrica (malária, dengue, febre amarela, esquistossomose) com sérias conseqüências para a saúde pública (PEDRALLI, 2003;VASCONCELOS et al, 2006). Respondem pelas maiores taxas de emissão de metano quando comparadas às áreas de floresta inundada ou águas abertas (DEVOL et al, 1988;BARTLET et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified