2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019jg005474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions From Reservoirs: Controls and Upscaling

Abstract: Estimating carbon dioxide (CO 2) and methane (CH 4) emission rates from reservoirs is important for regional and national greenhouse gas inventories. A lack of methodologically consistent data sets for many parts of the world, including agriculturally intensive areas of the United States, poses a major challenge to the development of models for predicting emission rates. In this study, we used a systematic approach to measure CO 2 and CH 4 diffusive and ebullitive emission rates from 32 reservoirs distributed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(181 reference statements)
0
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It falls in the fourth quintile ( > 60 %) of the reservoir emission rates that included ebullition reported in Deemer et al (2016) ; the warm season falls in the upper quintile ( > 80 %) of those reservoirs. The warm season also falls into the upper quartile ( > 75 %) of the 32 temperate reservoirs surveyed by Beaulieu et al (2020) . This result strengthens the finding that midlatitude, eutrophic reservoirs in the midwestern USA can support high CH 4 emission rates (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It falls in the fourth quintile ( > 60 %) of the reservoir emission rates that included ebullition reported in Deemer et al (2016) ; the warm season falls in the upper quintile ( > 80 %) of those reservoirs. The warm season also falls into the upper quartile ( > 75 %) of the 32 temperate reservoirs surveyed by Beaulieu et al (2020) . This result strengthens the finding that midlatitude, eutrophic reservoirs in the midwestern USA can support high CH 4 emission rates (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses were performed using boosted regression tree analysis (BRT) (Elith et al, 2008;Beaulieu et al, 2020;Jarvis et al, 2020), which is a machine learning technique that tests for relationships between predictors (in this case, physical and chemical variables, see Table 1) and response variables (here three macrophyte indicators in shallow lakes and Chla) in a dataset. The principle is that a second model is ''boosted'' from the previous one by minimising its errors in order to achieve the best new model derived through a model simplification process, where each predictor is left out sequentially and the reduction in the predictive power is used to determine if it should stay in or not.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most attempts are centered on upscaling the GHG emission rates from individual waterbodies to the regional or global estimates and simply multiplying an average emission rate by the total waterbody surface area in the region of interest [8][9][10][11]. It is pointed out in [12] that this upscaling approach can be highly biased unless the emission rate measurements come from a representative sample of lakes or reservoirs in the region of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%