2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methane adsorption on shale under in situ conditions: Gas-in-place estimation considering in situ stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on lowpressure adsorption data, predicting the high-pressure adsorption isotherms is a very practical method. 19 Therefore, the adsorption data of samples 1−3 with a pressure less than 12 MPa are selected as the modeling data, and the adsorption data with a pressure greater than 12 MPa are used as the comparison data to compare the accuracy of the predicted data. The initial value and upper and lower limits of each parameter are set according to the value range of each parameter in Section 4.1, and the initial values of ε s /k, α p /k, and α m /k are −1000, −280, and 970 K, respectively; the upper and lower limits are −900 and −1100 K, −270 and −290 K, and 980 and 960 K, respectively.…”
Section: Excess Adsorption Isotherm Prediction Of the Monolayer And M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on lowpressure adsorption data, predicting the high-pressure adsorption isotherms is a very practical method. 19 Therefore, the adsorption data of samples 1−3 with a pressure less than 12 MPa are selected as the modeling data, and the adsorption data with a pressure greater than 12 MPa are used as the comparison data to compare the accuracy of the predicted data. The initial value and upper and lower limits of each parameter are set according to the value range of each parameter in Section 4.1, and the initial values of ε s /k, α p /k, and α m /k are −1000, −280, and 970 K, respectively; the upper and lower limits are −900 and −1100 K, −270 and −290 K, and 980 and 960 K, respectively.…”
Section: Excess Adsorption Isotherm Prediction Of the Monolayer And M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The buried depth of the shale reservoir is generally 2000–4000 m, and the reservoir pressure can reach 30–60 MPa. , The high-pressure adsorption test requires more precise experimental equipment and longer experimental period. Based on low-pressure adsorption data, predicting the high-pressure adsorption isotherms is a very practical method . Therefore, the adsorption data of samples 1–3 with a pressure less than 12 MPa are selected as the modeling data, and the adsorption data with a pressure greater than 12 MPa are used as the comparison data to compare the accuracy of the predicted data.…”
Section: Ch4 Adsorption Mechanism Based On the Ono–kondo Lattice Mode...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After a comprehensive comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the Langmuir model, Langmuir−Freundlich model, and Dubinin−Astakhov (D−A) model, a new adsorption model is derived by Li et al to describe the methane adsorption feature under various moisture. 38 Miao et al proposed a gas-reserve estimation method utilizing the SLD method, 39 in which the in situ stress condition was considered. From the above brief review, it can be demonstrated that the theoretical model derived from the rigorous microscopic physics can capture the methane adsorption feature in specific conditions, while key parameters required for the proposed model are generally unavailable and hard to determine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical model of shale gas adsorption is usually established based on isothermal adsorption experiment by using classical adsorption models to fit the experimental results, mainly including the mono molecule layer adsorption model, the multimolecular layers adsorption model, the microporous filling model, the simplified local density (SLD) adsorption model, the Ono-Kondo adsorption model, and the modified models based on classical adsorption theories. Although a large amount of research on experiments, simulation, and models of shale gas adsorption has been reported, these rich achievements are mainly for shallow and middle shale, so they cannot directly describe the more complex adsorption characteristics, such as deep shale gas reservoirs with higher temperature and higher pressure. Therefore, it is important to review the existing research methods and adsorption models of shale gas and clarify their features, and then put forward the next research direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%