2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12640-009-9024-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methamphetamine Induces Long-Term Alterations in Reactivity to Environmental Stimuli: Correlation with Dopaminergic and Serotonergic Toxicity

Abstract: Methamphetamine (METH) abuse is known to induce persistent cognitive and behavioral abnormalities, in association with alterations in serotonin (5-HT) and dopamine (DA) systems, yet the neurobiological mechanisms underpinning this link are elusive. Thus, in the present study we analyzed the long-term impact of an acute toxic regimen of METH (4 mg/kg, subcutaneous x 4 injections, 2 h apart) on the reactivity of adult male rats to environmental stimuli, and correlated it to toxicity on 5-HT and DA innervations. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The validity of our model of METH neurotoxicity is further strengthened by the finding that a METH dose lower than that we used here (4 mg/kg) administered accordingly to the same “binge” schedule (4 administrations, 2 hours apart) is able to induce toxicity on 5-HT and DA innervations. Indeed, 3 and 7 days following the last METH administration we reported a loss of DAergic and 5-HTergic terminals measured by means of immunohistochemical detection of their transporters (5-HTT and DAT) [46]. Moreover, this model of METH administration (4×10 mg/kg, 2 h apart) is currently the most frequently used rat model of METH neurotocivity, and is associated with striatal dopamine and serotonin depletion, hyperthermia and high mortality [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The validity of our model of METH neurotoxicity is further strengthened by the finding that a METH dose lower than that we used here (4 mg/kg) administered accordingly to the same “binge” schedule (4 administrations, 2 hours apart) is able to induce toxicity on 5-HT and DA innervations. Indeed, 3 and 7 days following the last METH administration we reported a loss of DAergic and 5-HTergic terminals measured by means of immunohistochemical detection of their transporters (5-HTT and DAT) [46]. Moreover, this model of METH administration (4×10 mg/kg, 2 h apart) is currently the most frequently used rat model of METH neurotocivity, and is associated with striatal dopamine and serotonin depletion, hyperthermia and high mortality [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, differentiating preexisting deficits from methamphetamine-induced cognitive deficits poses significant challenges (Dean et al, 2013), and concerns regarding the interpretation of these discrepancies and their clinical significance have been raised (Hart et al, 2012). Despite this, the preponderance of evidence from preclinical, cross-sectional human, and brain imaging studies supports the assertion that methamphetamine abuse does indeed cause cognitive decline in at least some individuals (i.e., individuals at the age of early-to-middle adulthood; Dean et al, 2013) and that some cognitive/behavioral changes may be the result of methamphetamine neurotoxicity (Bortolato et al, 2009). Further, individual difference variables such as age, education level, and genotype appear to moderate the relationship between methamphetamine use and cognitive deficits (Dean et al., 2013).…”
Section: Neurocognitive Functioning Associated With Chronic Methammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to prior studies (Bortolato et al, 2009a), mice (8 per genotype) were individually exposed to two identical novel objects, affixed to the floor and symmetrically placed 6 cm from the two nearest walls of a cubed Plexiglas box (20 Â 20 Â 20 cm 3 ) lit to 120 lux. Mice were placed in a corner facing the center, equidistant from each object, with the starting position rotated and counter-balanced for genotype.…”
Section: Novel Object Interaction and Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%