2017
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metformin use and survival outcomes in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Previous studies have evaluated the effects of metformin use on survival outcomes in endometrial cancer, but their results are inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a quantitative assessment of the drug's effects based on available evidence. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify relevant studies that evaluated the association between metformin use on survival outcomes in endometrial cancer. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of MET in diabetic patients is associated with significantly lower risks of cancer incidence and mortality [9][10][11][12]. More germane to this study, EC patients with diabetes using MET exhibited improved overall and progression-free survival [11,13,14]. Whereas the therapeutic benefits of MET in many cancer types are known to be mediated by the inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTORsignaling pathways [7,15], the anti-cancer effects and signaling mechanisms of MET in non-diabetic vs. diabetic women with EC have not been fully characterized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of MET in diabetic patients is associated with significantly lower risks of cancer incidence and mortality [9][10][11][12]. More germane to this study, EC patients with diabetes using MET exhibited improved overall and progression-free survival [11,13,14]. Whereas the therapeutic benefits of MET in many cancer types are known to be mediated by the inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTORsignaling pathways [7,15], the anti-cancer effects and signaling mechanisms of MET in non-diabetic vs. diabetic women with EC have not been fully characterized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The in vivo (proof-of-concept) study involved a short-term MET treatment (pre-surgical; between diagnosis and hysterectomy) of non-diabetic obese women with EC, while the in vitro experiments analyzed the direct effects of MET on proliferation, apoptosis, and gene expression in the human endometrial carcinoma cell line Ishikawa. While the in vivo results were limited by the small patient sample size due in part to the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in obese women with EC [3], the non-diabetic obese control and treatment groups did not differ in BMI and age, thus precluding the confounding issues of insulin resistance, adiposity, and/or menopausal status found in other studies that had previously evaluated the effects of MET in EC [14,[30][31][32][33][34]. Importantly, the congruence of changes elicited by MET in vivo (protein) and in vitro (mRNA) on the expression of PGR, PTEN, KLF9, and ERα provides mechanistic underpinnings to the direct effects of MET on EC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…136 duplicate articles were initially excluded, and an additional 35 articles were screened by title. Another 102 articles were excluded after assessing the abstract, and 46 articles were finally excluded after full-text screening and finally, 16 eligible meta-analyses reporting various kinds of cancer mortality or survival in 11 cancers were finally selected for re-analysis ( Figure 1) [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. Overall, all-cause mortality was reported as outcomes in 11 cancer types, cancer-specific mortality in 8 cancer types, recurrence-free survival in 5 cancer types, progression-free survival in 4 cancer types and disease-free survival in one cancer type (Tables 1-4).…”
Section: Search Strategy For the Literature And Included Studies For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metformin represents a universal, but very weak, anticancer drug. Meta-analyses of multiple studies support its antitumor effect, affecting, for example, cancers of lung 6 , prostate 7 , and endometrium 8 . However, in some studies no improvement was observed, e.g., with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%