2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2020.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meter classification of Arabic poems using deep bidirectional recurrent neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Yousefi [ 29 ] finds the unwritten linking vowel (izafe) by convolutional neural networks. Al-shaibani et al [ 30 ] by deep bidirectional recurrent neural networks classify the meter of Arabic poems without diacritizing. Abandah et al [ 31 ] use recurrent neural networks with bidirectional long short-term memory cells for diacritizing the input Arabic poems.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yousefi [ 29 ] finds the unwritten linking vowel (izafe) by convolutional neural networks. Al-shaibani et al [ 30 ] by deep bidirectional recurrent neural networks classify the meter of Arabic poems without diacritizing. Abandah et al [ 31 ] use recurrent neural networks with bidirectional long short-term memory cells for diacritizing the input Arabic poems.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sudanese vocabulary is mostly inspired by MSA, but with important Greek, Turkish and English modifications to the phonology. The morphology of Sudanese words shares many features with MSA, but the method of dialect inflection is Saudi (3C) 90+10 CNN 86.54% [43] Moroccan (2C) 90+10 Majority Voting 83.45% [23] Egyptian, Iraqi and Levantine (3C) 80+10+10 LSTM 71.4 % [6] Jordanian (2C) 90+10 Ensemble 93.4% [5] Lebanon (2C) 80+20 LR 89.80% [1] Algerian (2C) 85+15 SVM 0.86% [31] Tunisian (2C) 80+10+10 Deep-LSTM 90.00% [31] JEG, TAC and TSAC (2C) 90+10 Tw-StAR 82.08% [25] Egyptian, MSA (2C)(n-C) 80+10+10 MC1, MC2 92.96% [7] Modern Standard Arabic 85+15 BiGRU 94.32% [3] Modern Standard Arabic 80+20 RF+SMOTE 96.00% more complicated than MSA in some respects [20]. Following a thorough study of such dialect differences, we have created two datasets based on social media posts, built a CNN-based model for sentiment analyis, and applied it to the datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It varies greatly from language to language, which implies that algorithms designed for poetry analysis in one language more often may not be equally applicable to another. In contrast to Hindi, a significant amount of work has been done in computing poetic elements of other languages, such as metre detection and classification of Arabic [1,4,18] and Persian poetry [28], a study of metre as a stylistic feature in Latin poetry [6], an expert system for harmony test of Arabic poetry [3], a statistical evaluation of Chinese Tang [2,32] and English [10] poetry, an emotion based classification for Marathi [26], Punjabi [8], and Arabic [20] poetry, a study of rhythm of Tibetan poetry [14]. One of the surprises of this study is that none of the above languages has a computational system or tool that recognises and quantifies figure of speech, a very important component of poetry, which is one of the novelties of this article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%