Meteorology, not emissions, helps explain an upward trend in atmospheric methane across the US

Abstract

US natural gas production increased by ˜43% between 2005 and 2015, but there is disagreement in the scientific literature on whether this growth led to increased methane emissions. In this study, we evaluate the possible contributions of emissions versus meteorology to an upward trend in US atmospheric methane observations during 2007-2015. We find that interannual variability (IAV) in meteorology yields an apparent upward trend in atmospheric methane across much of the US. We further find that IAV in atmospheric methane at several observation sites is correlated with IAV in local wind speed. Overall, our results show that US trends in atmospheric methane largely reflect variability in meteorology, and are unlikely to be a direct reflection of trends in emissions. The results of this study therefore lend support for the conclusion that there was little upward trend in US methane emissions during this time.

Downward Trend in Methane Detected in a Northern Colorado Oil and Gas Production Region Using AIRS Satellite Data

“…Feng et al. (2022) find that interannual variability in meteorology (especially wind speeds) plays a significant role in trends in CH 4 in the US. Reddy and Pfister (2016) demonstrated that maximum surface ozone concentrations in and near the DDJB are highly correlated with 500 hPa heights.…”

Attribution of the 2020 surge in atmospheric methane by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations

“…China, the largest anthropogenic methane source [Janssens-Maenhout et al, 2019], shows weaker increases. However, such year-to-year comparisons in methane concentrations may have sampling bias and not necessarily relate to changes in emissions because atmospheric transport also drives interannual variability [Bruhwiler et al, 2017;Feng et al, 2021]. The inversion allows us to correct for the effect of transport and isolate the contributions from changes in sources and sinks.…”