2006
DOI: 10.1144/gsl.sp.2006.256.01.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meteorites in history: an overview from the Renaissance to the 20th century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we adopt a broad definition of "eucrite" that does not require the source body to be identified, and return to this question in the final section. Note that the original eucrites were meteorites named by Rose in 1863 (e.g., Greshake, 2006), not terrestrial rocks as commonly believed (e.g., Marvin, 2006).…”
Section: Samples Analyzed and Terminolgymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we adopt a broad definition of "eucrite" that does not require the source body to be identified, and return to this question in the final section. Note that the original eucrites were meteorites named by Rose in 1863 (e.g., Greshake, 2006), not terrestrial rocks as commonly believed (e.g., Marvin, 2006).…”
Section: Samples Analyzed and Terminolgymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, achondrites, representing 8% of meteorites overall [67], are known to pass both stages of melting and differentiation [68]. Their chemical composition and principal minerals (e.g., [69] [70]) are similar to those of magmatic rocks of Earth's crust and upper mantle, and contain PGE amounts (see Table 2 and Table 3) about two orders of magnitude lower than CI carbonaceous chondrites (e.g., [71]) which have about the same level of the PGE content that the Earth's upper mantle rocks. Interestingly, that achondrites do not have chondrules, which most likely were re-worked during melting, differentiation and alteration processes passed by achondrites.…”
Section: On the Formation Of Pges And Pgms And Their Content In Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That meteorites might have their origin in the depths of space was first postulated by the German physicist Ernst Florenz Friedrich Chladni (1756Chladni ( -1827 in 1794 when, following a study of numerous eyewitness accounts, including that of the 1751 I-Iraschina meteorite (that fell in Croatia in 1751), he postulated (see Marvin 1996Marvin , 2006 that there existed small 104 R.J. HOWARTH celestial bodies with compositions similar to planets, which were attracted by the Earth's gravitational field and, falling at great speed, the atmospheric friction heated them and made them luminous. Although it is uncertain whether he ever actually saw a fragment of the Pallas iron, 2 composed of olivine and nickeliferous iron metal and reported to have fallen to Earth from a fireball in Siberia in 1749 (Ivanova & Nazarov 2006), he realized from accounts that its mineralogical composition was quite different to that of known terrestrial rocks.…”
Section: Meteorite Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although systematic collections of meteorites began to be built up at the Natural History Museum of Vienna (under Carl Franz Anton, Ritter von Schreibers (1775-1852, who published a book on the subject in 1820), at the University of Berlin (Chladni 1825) and elsewhere much of the early investigative work on meteorites was conducted by mineralogists and chemists who were largely content to establish the individual compositions of these objects, rather than obtaining an overall view (Marvin 2006).…”
Section: Meteorite Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%