2021
DOI: 10.1177/16094069211019907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metatheme Analysis: A Qualitative Method for Cross-Cultural Research

Abstract: In recent years, there has been a florescence of cross-cultural research using ethnographic and qualitative data. This cutting-edge work confronts a range of significant methodological challenges, but has not yet addressed how thematic analysis can be modified for use in cross-cultural ethnography. Thematic analysis is widely used in qualitative and mixed-methods research, yet is not currently well-adapted to cross-cultural ethnographic designs. We build on existing thematic analysis techniques to discuss a me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach presented here, developed alongside and informed by other comparative multi-sited ethnographic works (e.g., Benton et al 2017;Beresford 2021;Ember 2009;Garth and Hardin 2019;Jordan 1992;Mendenhall 2019;Pacheco-Vega 2020), enables us to identify overarching metathemes and inter-relationships between themes across our datasets. After we finished data collection, we met repeatedly to discuss the themes emerging from our data during analysis, paying particular attention to the identification of, and agreement around, metathemes (Wutich et al 2021). In cross-cultural and multi-sited research, metathemes are broad, over-arching themes that cut across and encompass many smaller site-or culturally specific themes (Bernard et al 2016;Hagaman and Wutich 2017;Ryan and Bernard 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The approach presented here, developed alongside and informed by other comparative multi-sited ethnographic works (e.g., Benton et al 2017;Beresford 2021;Ember 2009;Garth and Hardin 2019;Jordan 1992;Mendenhall 2019;Pacheco-Vega 2020), enables us to identify overarching metathemes and inter-relationships between themes across our datasets. After we finished data collection, we met repeatedly to discuss the themes emerging from our data during analysis, paying particular attention to the identification of, and agreement around, metathemes (Wutich et al 2021). In cross-cultural and multi-sited research, metathemes are broad, over-arching themes that cut across and encompass many smaller site-or culturally specific themes (Bernard et al 2016;Hagaman and Wutich 2017;Ryan and Bernard 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this part (Step 1) of the metatheme analysis, we conducted site-specific theme identification. Each of us used a multi-method approach to theme identification, drawing on in-vivo coding, metaphor analysis, idioms and euphemisms, and repetition-based theme analysis (Ryan and Bernard 2003;Wutich et al 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A fourth limitation relates to the realism of the experimental design and measuring behavioral intention in consumer research (see discussions by Morales at al., 2017 andWutich et al, 2021). The current study strived to increase external validity by displaying an Instagram post that looked as real as possible within the survey.…”
Section: Limitations and Further Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%