Metasynthesis: An Original Method to Synthesize Qualitative Literature in Psychiatry

Abstract

BackgroundMetasynthesis—the systematic review and integration of findings from qualitative studies—is an emerging technique in medical research that can use many different methods. Nevertheless, the method must be appropriate to the specific scientific field in which it is used. The objective is to describe the steps of a metasynthesis method adapted from Thematic Synthesis and phenomenology to fit the particularities of psychiatric research.MethodWe detail each step of the method used in a metasynthesis published in 2015 on adolescent and young adults suicidal behaviors. We provide clarifications in several methodological points using the latest literature on metasyntheses. The method is described in six steps: define the research question and the inclusion criteria, select the studies, assess their quality, extract and present the formal data, analyze the data, and express the synthesis.ConclusionMetasyntheses offer an appropriate balance between an objective framework, a rigorously scientific approach to data analysis and the necessary contribution of the researcher’s subjectivity in the construction of the final work. They propose a third level of comprehension and interpretation that brings original insights, improve the global understanding in psychiatry, and propose immediate therapeutic implications. They should be included in the psychiatric common research toolkit to become better recognized by clinicians and mental health professionals.

Experiences of taking neuroleptic medication and impacts on symptoms, sense of self and agency: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative data

“…In line with recommendations for qualitative research synthesis, we did not set quality criteria for inclusion [19,20].…”

“…Thematic synthesis is an established method that uses the basic principles and practices of thematic analysis [21] to draw together key themes from across studies, and in so doing develop further interpretations or new analytic insight [20]. Similar to thematic analysis, thematic synthesis offers a standardised but flexible approach that can be used to integrate relatively large numbers of qualitative studies and is recommended for topics in mental health [19].…”

“…Descriptive themes were then grouped into analytic themes which were refined collaboratively through a further process of iteration. This step involves "going beyond the descriptive synthesis to produce a more conceptual line of argument" [19] (P 7). As with thematic analysis, we endeavoured to enhance validity through reflexive and collaborative working, in which we discussed and questioned theoretical and personal positions held by team members [22].…”

The State of Statistics Education Research in Client Disciplines: Themes and Trends Across the University

“…Metasynthesis, the adaptation of systematic review techniques for qualitative studies (Lachal et al 2017), was used to select and evaluate research articles on teaching and learning in statistics from outside of the statistics education community. The literature collection resulting from this search was analyzed using two techniques: qualitative thematic analysis and quantitative text analysis.…”

President's message—Presenting an SNRS consensus statement on the language of research

“…Meta-synthesis is the systematic review and integration of findings from several related qualitative studies (Lachal, Revah-Levy, Orri, & Moro, 2017). Meta-synthesis is a complex method requiring skill in qualitative methods and considerable time to complete.…”