2019
DOI: 10.3892/or.2019.7321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma cells growing in 3D on poly‑D‑lysine or laminin present a stem‑like phenotype and drug resistance

Abstract: 3D spheroids are built by heterogeneous cell types in different proliferative and metabolic states and are enriched in cancer stem cells. The main aim of the study was to investigate the usefulness of a novel metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) 3D spheroid culture for in vitro cancer stem cell physiology research and drug toxicity screening. RCC cell lines, Caki-1 (skin metastasis derived) and ACHN (pleural effusion derived), were efficiently cultured in growth-factor/serum deprived, defined, StemXvivo and N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EMT is a process identified as one of the key features in tumour invasion and metastasis. We identified a total of 19 publications [ 15 , 24 , 50 , 69 , 73 , 74 , 76 , 82 , 84 , 92 , 94 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 ] comparing markers of EMT in 2D vs. 3D tumour cultures, with 18 of those showing enhanced measurements of EMT in 3D compared to 2D cultures. In contrast with the generalised cohort of studies concerning biomimicry of in vitro cancer cultures, the studies specifically concerning EMT consisted of a majority of scaffold-based cultures at 67%, and 33% involving non-scaffold-based cultures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EMT is a process identified as one of the key features in tumour invasion and metastasis. We identified a total of 19 publications [ 15 , 24 , 50 , 69 , 73 , 74 , 76 , 82 , 84 , 92 , 94 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 ] comparing markers of EMT in 2D vs. 3D tumour cultures, with 18 of those showing enhanced measurements of EMT in 3D compared to 2D cultures. In contrast with the generalised cohort of studies concerning biomimicry of in vitro cancer cultures, the studies specifically concerning EMT consisted of a majority of scaffold-based cultures at 67%, and 33% involving non-scaffold-based cultures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified a total of 42 publications [ 16 , 19 , 22 , 23 , 30 , 41 , 42 , 45 , 49 , 52 , 56 , 59 , 61 , 64 , 68 , 72 , 74 , 80 , 85 , 89 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 105 , 106 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 ] comparing cell response to chemotherapy and other interventions between 2D and 3D in vitro tumour models, using a variety of anticancer agents and taking into account any publications which involved more than one type of anticancer agents, yielding in total 85 separate findings, including 79 outcomes concerning chemotherapy agents, three involving radiotherapy, and a further five exploring natural compound agents such as orange-peel flavones. The definitions for drug response varied throughout the studies in terms of markers used and duration over which drug responses were measured.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reflects the biomimicry of drug penetration into a 3D mass rather than a cell sheet and has been described in other 3D models, for example, matrigel, 37 collagen hydrogels, fibronectin 38 and RCC spheres. 39 In tumouroids, drug penetration is even more challenging as the cancer mass is surrounded by a dense 10% collagen matrix. 24 Differential responses may also be linked to altered target receptor levels in 3D.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(C) . Cell culture-based examples of the impact of different types of matrices and forces that result in changes in gene transcription and angiogenesis as they relate to cancer aggressiveness ( 1 Novak et al, 2019 , 2 Bordeleau et al, 2017 , 3 Seidlits et al, 2011 , 4 Lin et al, 2015 , 5 Larson et al, 2014 , 6 Brodaczewska et al, 2019 , 7 Pankova et al, 2019 , 8 Jain et al, 2013 , 9 Sewell-Loftin et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Evidence Of Mechanotransduction To the Genome In Cell Culturmentioning
confidence: 99%