2019
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metastasis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in organ transplant recipients and the immunocompetent population: is there a difference? a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Background Organ transplant recipients (OTR) have a higher risk of developing cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) compared to the immunocompetent population. Immunosuppression is often stated as a risk factor for metastasis. However, evidence for this is scarce.Objectives To investigate the cSCC metastasis risk in OTR and the immunocompetent population by systematically reviewing the literature.Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed up to January 2018 using: Medline; Embase; Web of Sc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The rates of metastasis of tumors with high-risk features can surpass 20%. 3,10,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Once metastasis is detected, 5-year survival rates drop to 50% to 83% and to less than 40% for patients with regional and distant metastasis, respectively. 16,[20][21][22] Because early detection of metastasis is correlated with better outcomes, accurate identification of patients at high risk for metastasis is critical, potentially allowing for early adjuvant therapy, while also avoiding overtreatment of low-risk tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The rates of metastasis of tumors with high-risk features can surpass 20%. 3,10,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Once metastasis is detected, 5-year survival rates drop to 50% to 83% and to less than 40% for patients with regional and distant metastasis, respectively. 16,[20][21][22] Because early detection of metastasis is correlated with better outcomes, accurate identification of patients at high risk for metastasis is critical, potentially allowing for early adjuvant therapy, while also avoiding overtreatment of low-risk tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few studies reported on immunosuppressed patients in their cohort. Patients on immunosuppression develop cSCC that tend to behave more aggressively, with a higher rate of both local recurrence and metastasis compared to immunocompetent patients (9,(33)(34)(35). Also, peripheral tumor borders can be difficult to properly define because of severe damage to the surrounding skin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to BCC that rarely metastasize, cSCC may form metastases in up to 10% of cases [4]. Crossing of the basal layer is considered a key factor in invading the underlying dermis and dissemination of tumour cells.…”
Section: Pathogenesis/oncogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, cSCC are more aggressive than BCC. In up to 10% of patients, metastases may develop, with a high mortality rate [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%