2020
DOI: 10.1002/admi.201902090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metastability at Defective Metal Oxide Interfaces and Nanoconfined Structures

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 309 publications
(323 reference statements)
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The heat of formation is calculated as the difference between the DFT total energy of the candidate material and the energy of the convex hull at that particular composition. To include metastability [ 32 ], we consider a material thermodynamically stable when its heat of formation is up to 0.1 eV/atom. Furthermore, calculations of the mechanical and dynamic stability could be useful to confirm whether the candidate material could be synthesized or not.…”
Section: Autonomous Workflow and Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat of formation is calculated as the difference between the DFT total energy of the candidate material and the energy of the convex hull at that particular composition. To include metastability [ 32 ], we consider a material thermodynamically stable when its heat of formation is up to 0.1 eV/atom. Furthermore, calculations of the mechanical and dynamic stability could be useful to confirm whether the candidate material could be synthesized or not.…”
Section: Autonomous Workflow and Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They tested the cell at 800 °C in SOEC mode, and even after a test of 1000 h, no isolated nickel particles were observed. The strong adhesion of CGO (GDC) nanoparticles on the nickel surface and the heterogeneous mass diffusion mechanisms in nanocomposites may impede surface diffusion [ 62 , 63 ]. Although infiltrated electrodes show significant advantages over traditional electrodes, the coarsening and aggregation of the nano-nickel often appear, caused by the high diffusive activity of the nanoparticles [ 23 , 52 ].…”
Section: Degradation Mechanism and Countermeasuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the energy of the tube to its most stable 3D bulk structures, we also calculate the convex hull energy of the tube E CH at its optimal radius (E CH−min ). Except for Fe, all studied nanotubes show good stability against the decomposition into competing bulk structures (taken from the Materials Project database [27]) for at least one of the calculated combinations (here we define a combination stable when the energy of the candidate compound is within 0.2 eV/atom above the convex hull to account for a possible metastability [28,29,30]). This is in good agreement with published studies on the stability of 2D Janus monolayers.…”
Section: O T E O S E O S S T E S E T E S S E C L I B R I C L B Rmentioning
confidence: 99%