1992
DOI: 10.1063/1.42386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metastability and transfer-matrix finite-range scaling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently one of us [30,31] introduced a transfer-matrix method, based on the concept of "constrained" joint probability densities, to obtain analogues of the free-energy density for constrained states. Preliminary applications [30][31][32] to the Q1DI model have shown qualitative agreement between the behavior of the free-energy-density analogue associated with the metastable eigenvalue branch of the transfer matrix and the analytically continued free-energy density. In this study we use this constrained-transfer-matrix (CTM) method with finite-range scaling [34] to obtain more quantitative results for the scaling of the imaginary part of the metastable "constrained" free-energy density.…”
Section: The Constrained-transfer-matrix Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently one of us [30,31] introduced a transfer-matrix method, based on the concept of "constrained" joint probability densities, to obtain analogues of the free-energy density for constrained states. Preliminary applications [30][31][32] to the Q1DI model have shown qualitative agreement between the behavior of the free-energy-density analogue associated with the metastable eigenvalue branch of the transfer matrix and the analytically continued free-energy density. In this study we use this constrained-transfer-matrix (CTM) method with finite-range scaling [34] to obtain more quantitative results for the scaling of the imaginary part of the metastable "constrained" free-energy density.…”
Section: The Constrained-transfer-matrix Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In a similar study [29] of an Ising model with N×∞ cylindrical geometry in which the interaction range is linear in the cross section, evidence from the transfer-matrix eigenvalue spectrum was found for the emergence of a classical spinodal in the limit of weak, longrange interactions. In the present work we apply a recently developed "constrained-transfermatrix" (CTM) method [30][31][32][33] to study the properties of the metastable phase of this quasione-dimensional Ising (Q1DI) model. Since the transfer matrix for the N×∞ Q1DI model has a rank of N+1 [29], instead of the typical value of 2 N for short-range Ising systems, it is relatively easy to study large systems by transfer-matrix techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, complex-valued constrained free energies were numerically obtained for both the two-dimensional nearest-neighbor Ising ferromagnet [11,12] and for models with weak long-range forces [13][14][15] by a constrained-transfer-matrix method introduced by one of us [16]. Although no dynamical aspects were explicitly considered to obtain the constrained free energies, the average free-energy cost of a critical droplet was obtained over a wide range of fields and temperatures, in good agreement with the predictions of field-theoretical droplet models [8][9][10]14,15,17] and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations [1,[4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it is well known that both the equilibrium and the metastable properties of equivalentneighbor models are exactly described by mean-field theory in the thermodynamic limit [2,[13][14][15], these models are often referred to as "mean-field models" [22]. Consistent with this usage, we call the class of dynamics that we define here "macroscopic mean-field dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of the CTM formalism applied to a short-range-force model, as presented here, and to two-and three-state models with weak long-range forces, presented elsewhere [45,46,61,62,63], clearly reveals the differences and similarities between these models [64]. The analytic continuation of the equilibrium free energy in long-range-force models has a branch-point singularity at a well-defined non-zero spinodal field [14,15,16,17,26,27,28,45,46,61,62,63], whereas it has an essential singularity on the coexistence line at zero magnetic field in short-range-force models [29,30,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. Moreover, whereas long-range-force models exhibit infinitely long-lived metastable phases in the limit of infinite interaction range, short-range-force models display finite, albeit very long lifetimes, even in the thermodynamic limit [22,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%