2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2009.06.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metasomatic origin of diamonds in the world's largest diamondiferous eclogite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The carbon isotopes of the studied diamonds from three localities in China are thus interpreted to reflect the isotopic signature of their mantle source. Between core areas and outer growth zones within individual diamond or among separate diamonds, there are no correlations between the intensity of cathode luminescence and carbon isotope ratios, in accordance with the results of previous studies [19,38,39].…”
Section: Growth Zones Of Diamonds and Their Relationship To Carbon Issupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The carbon isotopes of the studied diamonds from three localities in China are thus interpreted to reflect the isotopic signature of their mantle source. Between core areas and outer growth zones within individual diamond or among separate diamonds, there are no correlations between the intensity of cathode luminescence and carbon isotope ratios, in accordance with the results of previous studies [19,38,39].…”
Section: Growth Zones Of Diamonds and Their Relationship To Carbon Issupporting
confidence: 90%
“…While a number of studies have proposed an origin for cratonic eclogites as vestiges of subducted altered oceanic crust (Jacob 2004;Taylor and Anand 2004;Snyder et al 1995;Lowry et al 1999), it has also been proposed that at least some eclogites may have formed as cumulates within the mantle (Taylor and Neal 1989). Strong metasomatism of eclogitic rocks further complicates their interpretation in terms of their original protolith (Liu et al 2009;Smart et al 2012;Gréau et al 2011;Huang et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare the equilibration conditions of eclogites worldwide, it is important to be able to employ a geobarometer that is based only on garnet and clinopyroxene (cpx) that are present in all eclogites. This has proved difficult, however, (Koons 1984;Mukhopadhyay 1991;Newton 1986), and has been proposed to be also complicated by metasomatic overprinting (Liu et al 2009;Smart et al 2009;Tappe et al 2011). Only a few such studies exist, and these are either limited in their application by the chemical system (e.g., CMAS and Cr content), the narrow compositional range of the calibration, or by the reliance on data from non-eclogitic assemblages (Brey et al 1986;Mukhopadhyay 1991;Nimis and Taylor 2000;Simakov and Taylor 2000;Simakov 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%