2011
DOI: 10.1109/tcbb.2011.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metasample-Based Sparse Representation for Tumor Classification

Abstract: A reliable and accurate identification of the type of tumors is crucial to the proper treatment of cancers. In recent years, it has been shown that sparse representation (SR) by 1 l -norm minimization is robust to noise, outliers and even incomplete measurements, and SR has been successfully used for classification. This paper presents a new SR based method for tumor classification using gene expression data. A set of metasamples are extracted from the training samples, and then an input testing sample is repr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that, the result of SVM, SRC and MSRC in our experiments are slightly different from those reported in Refs. [2,15,21]. This is probably because the distribution file of cross validation in our experiments is different from them.…”
Section: Two-class Classificationmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Note that, the result of SVM, SRC and MSRC in our experiments are slightly different from those reported in Refs. [2,15,21]. This is probably because the distribution file of cross validation in our experiments is different from them.…”
Section: Two-class Classificationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The proposed method compare with several state-of-the art methods, such as the widely used SVM, 2 SRC, 15 MRSC. 21 In our proposed MKSRC method, two parameters should to set, namely, positive regularization parameter and number of metagene of each class p i . The value of is given according to a previous study, 14 as following:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations