1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf02699192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metaplectic correspondence

Abstract: L'accès aux archives de la revue « Publications mathématiques de l'I.H.É.S. » (http:// www.ihes.fr/IHES/Publications/Publications.html) implique l'accord avec les conditions générales d'utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d'une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques ht… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The metaplectic tensor product in the context of GL n has been studied by various authors [17,37,53,68,69]. Our definitions were motivated by the construction of Kable [37] (see Remark 2.2 below).…”
Section: Representations Of Levi Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metaplectic tensor product in the context of GL n has been studied by various authors [17,37,53,68,69]. Our definitions were motivated by the construction of Kable [37] (see Remark 2.2 below).…”
Section: Representations Of Levi Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to avoid this difficulty, a method of parabolic induction is proposed in §26.2 [4], in which M is replaced by a subgroup M B which is isomorphic to (an obvious quotient of) M B 1 × • • • × M B . Despite this nice decomposition, H. Sun ( §4 [13]) has pointed out that the centralizer of M B in M is not necessarily contained in the product of M B and the centre of G. As a result, the representation of M constructed in §26.2 [4] is not necessarily irreducible, as is claimed there. In other words, this metaplectic analogue for the usual tensor product representation may be reducible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few other approaches towards the Shimura Correspondence, such as, as a case of the theta correspondence [17], [14], [7], use of Selberg's trace formulas [5], [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%