2002
DOI: 10.1080/10510970209388580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metaphoric manifestations of talking “team” with team novices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Oswick and Grant (1996: 217) make the case for intermediate metaphors which ‘have more than an isolated similarity, or fleeting resemblance, to the domain onto which they are projected’, and their role ‘is a more sophisticated one than that of mere embellishment or simplification’ (Oswick and Grant, 1996: 217). According to Gribas and Downs (2002: 113), ‘intermediate metaphors are consciously used, and we are fully aware of their symbolic functioning’. However, intermediate metaphors are not superficial figures of speech.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Oswick and Grant (1996: 217) make the case for intermediate metaphors which ‘have more than an isolated similarity, or fleeting resemblance, to the domain onto which they are projected’, and their role ‘is a more sophisticated one than that of mere embellishment or simplification’ (Oswick and Grant, 1996: 217). According to Gribas and Downs (2002: 113), ‘intermediate metaphors are consciously used, and we are fully aware of their symbolic functioning’. However, intermediate metaphors are not superficial figures of speech.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, intermediate metaphors are not superficial figures of speech. They are rather broad and heuristic in that they allow for extending symbolic connections with second-order comparisons (Gribas and Downs, 2002: 623–624). Also, ‘intermediate metaphors being cultural have a direct link into the discursive phenomenon, generating deeper levels of meaning, [and] enhancing creative theorizing’ (Richman and Mercer, 2000: 623–4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%