Metaphor of Symbols of Iraqi Architecture and Urbanism: Studying symbols as identity of Governmental Buildings’ façades in Baghdad, Iraq

Abstract

This paper analyses the role of the symbol considered as an effective tool used in strengthening the properties of façades in architecture and urbanism. The symbol always considers as one of the most important metaphors used in defining the local identity, in Iraq, the identity of architecture and urbanism has deteriorated and been disordered after 2003 when different trends used in shaping the façades. Due to this continuous deterioration, problems of forming identity of Iraqi architecture and urbanism have been grown with no considerations or restrictions. The research problem thus can be outlined: How have Iraqi architects dealt with the tasks of designing façades during the processes of formation, modification and decoration? Baghdad has selected as a case study to examine a set of samples of Governmental Buildings’ façades. The analysis has adopted a questionnaire technique to find out which factors have involved in the impact on the process of the metaphor of used symbols. The examination spans form the 1970s-2019. The results have shown that the use of the intellectual structure of the symbol has been very limited in the formations of the Governmental Buildings’ façades.

Sustainable Continuity of Cultural Heritage: An Approach for Studying Architectural Identity Using Typo-Morphology Analysis and Perception Survey

“…Meaning and essence of identity [34] Architectural identity as a continuous process through time [35][36][37][38][39][40] The relation between identity and place [41] Identity and building typologies [42] Identities of subcultures or hyper-identity [43] The role of societies in changing identities [44] Physical representation of architectural identity [37,41,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51] Architectural identity and culture [40][41][42]47,49,[51][52][53][54][55][56][57] Factors that effect architectural identity [53,55,[58][59][60][61] Architectural identity and modernity [41,62] Creation of new identities [63,64] From this analysis of previous studies, it is clear that there is a gap in the literature regarding the study of the continuity of architectural identity via the notion of cultural heritage as a process. This study contributes to studying architectural identity as a continuous process via the influence of the tangible and intangible sustainable elements that are considered part of cultural heritage, with Erbil as a case study.…”

Resilient Selection as a Mechanism for Adapting Iraqi Architecture to the Trends of Modernity

“…In the civil center of the city of Baghdad, many administrative buildings were designed by Iraqi architects influenced by modern architecture. So, there is a distinct local adaptation through the use of traditional elements and shapes such as arches and details within modern designs that appeared in the building of Industries union by the architect Rifaat Chadirj, the Baghdad Municipality by Muhammad Makkiya and the Ministry of trade by Hisham Mounir [6]. However, there is a difficulty in adapting the modern urban design that relies on wide straight streets and inserting them within the organic traditional fabric.…”

Modern Heritage of the Middle East potentials and values: Documenting a UAE Landmark

“…The architect designs were inspired by the characteristics of regional Iraqi architecture combined with contemporary features meeting social needs, placing his style in "international regionalism" or an Eclectic Approach. Chadirji's body of work comprehensively influenced the new developments in the Arab region (Harrington, 2014) (Bassim, 2020). (Bassim, 2020) His designs are conceptual and include abstract forms and arches.…”

“…Chadirji's body of work comprehensively influenced the new developments in the Arab region (Harrington, 2014) (Bassim, 2020). (Bassim, 2020) His designs are conceptual and include abstract forms and arches. He is inspired by second millennium Mesopotamian architecture and by architects such as Le Corbusier, Mies van der Rohe, and Auguste Perret.…”