2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2005.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metamotivational and contextual effects on performance, self-efficacy, and shifts in affective states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in line with SDT, which suggests that the failure to fully satisfy the basic need for competence lowers the quality of motivation, even for individuals who do not explicitly or consciously desire to do well on a particular activity On the other hand, positive feedback did not directly affect performance in Study 1. The finding that feedback has an effect on autonomous motivation and through this on future intentions and affect-based outcomes but not directly on performance is consistent with some previous studies (Bindarwish & Tenenbaum, 2006;Gernigon & Delloye, 2003). The findings are also in line with Brophy's (1999) contention that motivation should not be treated as analogous to performance, and that optimal motivation does not ensure maximal performance (especially in the short run).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings are in line with SDT, which suggests that the failure to fully satisfy the basic need for competence lowers the quality of motivation, even for individuals who do not explicitly or consciously desire to do well on a particular activity On the other hand, positive feedback did not directly affect performance in Study 1. The finding that feedback has an effect on autonomous motivation and through this on future intentions and affect-based outcomes but not directly on performance is consistent with some previous studies (Bindarwish & Tenenbaum, 2006;Gernigon & Delloye, 2003). The findings are also in line with Brophy's (1999) contention that motivation should not be treated as analogous to performance, and that optimal motivation does not ensure maximal performance (especially in the short run).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For instance, Whitehead and Corbin (1991), using a shuttle-run task similar to the one used in the present research, showed that strong positive versus strong negative feedback (i.e., informing performers that they were ranked either in the 80th or the 20th percentile, respectively) positively affected intrinsic motivation through perceptions of competence. Several other field studies using tasks as diverse as running over hurdles (Escarti & Guzman, 1999), throwing darts (Bindarwish & Tenenbaum, 2006), running (Gernigon, & Delloye, 2003), and shooting using guns or using computers (Gernigon, Fleurance, & Reine 2000) and employing as diverse samples as cricket athletes (Woodcock & Corbin, 1992) and running athletes (Gernigon, & Delloye, 2003) have replicated this pattern of results. The findings concerning the effect of positive feedback on actual performance are less consistent.…”
Section: Competence Support In Physical Education and Sportsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But it should be taken into account at least when one has reason to suspect that various identities can play a role with regard to a judgment or decision-making situation. For example, there have been many reversal theory studies in sport psychology (eg., Bindarwish & Tenenbaum, 2006;Kerr, 1994;Kerr et al, 2005). It was found, for example, that inappropriate meta-motivational states may have a negative impact on team performance (Males, Kerr, Thatcher, & Bellew, 2006).…”
Section: Potential Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a plethora of reversal theory research examining individual motivational styles or characteristics in relation to a wide variety of behaviours such as aggression and violence in sport (Kerr 2004), exercise dependence (Kerr et al 2007), participation motivation in physical activity and sport Lindner 2005, 2006;Sit et al 2008), smoking cessation (O'Connell 2006), self-efficacy during motor activities (Bindarwish and Tenenbaum 2006), behaviour management in the school and classroom (Mallows 2007), and health behaviour change (Finfgeld et al 2003). In the sport and exercise domain, for example, empirical evidence demonstrates a close association between one's motivational characteristics and sporting behaviour.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%