2021
DOI: 10.1029/2021gc009899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metamorphic Facies and Deformation Fabrics Diagnostic of Subduction: Insights From 2D Numerical Models

Abstract: Following the pioneering works carried out in the seventies (e.g., England & Richardson, 1977;Oxburgh & Turcotte, 1970, 1971Toksöz & Bird, 1977) several key advances have been made in numerical modeling methods that have improved the understanding of the thermo-mechanical evolution of the oceanic and continental lithosphere during oceanic subduction and continental collision (e.g.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
(266 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Southalpine domain, andalusite mostly occurs in high-temperature basement rocks that include sillimanite, cordierite, and/or spinel that reflect Permian-Triassic Buchan/Abukuma-type metamorphism. In the upper Val Camonica, andalusite is instead found in chloritoid-staurolite-garnet-bearing metapelites, which suggest higher P/T conditions as characteristic of Barrovian/Dalradian metamorphism [1,2]. This case study thus represents an excellent opportunity to improve our understanding of the Variscan basement exhumation path, from the Variscan convergence to the Permian-Triassic lithospheric thinning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Southalpine domain, andalusite mostly occurs in high-temperature basement rocks that include sillimanite, cordierite, and/or spinel that reflect Permian-Triassic Buchan/Abukuma-type metamorphism. In the upper Val Camonica, andalusite is instead found in chloritoid-staurolite-garnet-bearing metapelites, which suggest higher P/T conditions as characteristic of Barrovian/Dalradian metamorphism [1,2]. This case study thus represents an excellent opportunity to improve our understanding of the Variscan basement exhumation path, from the Variscan convergence to the Permian-Triassic lithospheric thinning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Andalusite is an indicator of high thermal regimes, such as those characterizing contact metamorphism or regional Buchan/Abukuma-type metamorphism in the metapelites of the continental crust [1,2]. High T/P ratios accountable for andalusite development are envisaged in various convergent and divergent settings, including late-orogenic thinning and lithospheric delamination in the mature stages of continental collision, as well as lithospheric thinning announcing continental rifting in post-orogenic settings [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metagranitoids (Apgr1) and metagabbros (Apg1) emplacement conditions are also reported (Table 1). Metamorphic facies modified after [111][112][113][114]. Black arrows represent geothermal gradients traditionally associated to arc regions (A) and plate interior (Pi), warm subduction complexes (WS), and cold subduction complexes (CS), as presented by [115].…”
Section: Thermobarometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such numerical models have been applied to investigate the mechanisms of exhumation of (U)HP rocks within Alpine‐type collisional belts (e.g., Burov et al., 2001; Butler et al., 2014; Gerya et al., 2002; Ruh et al., 2015; Stöckhert & Gerya, 2005; Warren et al., 2008; Yamato et al., 2008, 2007). Several of these studies trace individual numerical markers (e.g., Gerya & Yuen, 2003) in order to assess P ‐ T ‐ t trajectories during syn‐convergent exhumation (e.g., Butler et al., 2014; Gerya et al., 2002; Regorda et al., 2021; Ruh et al., 2015; Stöckhert & Gerya, 2005; Warren et al., 2008; Yamato et al., 2008, 2007). Although such numerical models successfully reproduce individual exhumation P ‐ T ‐ t trajectories that are comparable to the Alps (e.g., Butler et al., 2014; Gerya & Yuen, 2003; Ruh et al., 2015; Warren et al., 2008; Yamato et al., 2008, 2007), only few numerical modeling studies (e.g., Butler et al., 2014; Regorda et al., 2021) attempted to reproduce the spatially continuous distributions of metamorphic facies and the entire, regional‐scale metamorphic architecture of the Western Alps (Figure 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such numerical models have been applied to investigate the mechanisms of exhumation of (U)HP rocks within Alpine-type collisional belts (e.g., Burov et al, 2001;Butler et al, 2014;Gerya et al, 2002;Ruh et al, 2015;Stöckhert & Gerya, 2005;Warren et al, 2008;Yamato et al, 2008Yamato et al, , 2007. Several of these studies trace individual numerical markers (e.g., Gerya & Yuen, 2003) in order to assess P-T-t trajectories during syn-convergent exhumation (e.g., Butler et al, 2014;Gerya et al, 2002;Regorda et al, 2021;Ruh et al, 2015;Stöckhert & Gerya, 2005;Warren et al, 2008;Yamato et al, 2008Yamato et al, , 2007. Although such numerical models successfully reproduce individual exhumation P-T-t trajectories that are comparable to the Alps (e.g., Butler et al, 2014;Gerya & Yuen, 2003;Ruh et al, 2015;Warren et al, 2008;Yamato et al, 2008Yamato et al, , 2007, (b) Approximate pressure-temperature metamorphic facies grid (modified after Philpotts & Ague, 2009) with representative P-T estimates for Western Alpine units (dashed and solid lines are used for clearer visualization), BIU = (Rubatto & Hermann, 2001), MR = (Luisier et al, 2019;Vaughan-Hammon et al, 2021b), SE = (Lardeaux et al, 1982;Vuichard & Ballevre, 1988), VA = (Bousquet et al, 2002;Goffé & Bousquet, 1997;Wiederkehr et al, 2007), GP = (Bousquet et al, 2008;Manzotti et al, 2018), LU = (Wiederkehr et al, 2008), DB = (Cortiana et al, 1998...…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%