2001
DOI: 10.1007/s007100170048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metamorphic evolution of the Sierras de San Luis, Argentina: granulite facies metamorphism related to mafic intrusions

Abstract: SummaryThe Sierras de San Luis, which are part of the Sierras Pampeanas, are located in Central Argentina. The crystalline basement of the Sierras de San Luis is built up of three main blocks (western block, central block, and eastern block), which are separated by mylonite zones. The western and the eastern block are dominated by migmatites, whereas the central block is mostly lower in metamorphic grade ranging from greenschist facies to amphibolite facies, and locally to granulite facies in the vicinity of n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
46
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the western belt, the ''east-side-up'' displacement is consistent with the vertical displacement that is recorded by the La Arenilla shear zone, which is located in the eastern part of the Pringles Metamorphic Complex (Ortíz Suárez et al 1992;Hauzenberger et al 2001). …”
Section: Structural and Petrological Observationsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Within the western belt, the ''east-side-up'' displacement is consistent with the vertical displacement that is recorded by the La Arenilla shear zone, which is located in the eastern part of the Pringles Metamorphic Complex (Ortíz Suárez et al 1992;Hauzenberger et al 2001). …”
Section: Structural and Petrological Observationsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The extensional back-arc setting could have lead to mafic intrusions (Fig. 14b) as described by Hauzenberger et al (2001). These intrusions would be the heat sources that lead to amphibolite and local granulite facies metamorphism in the Pringles Metamorphic Complex.…”
Section: Geodynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Late Cambrian to Ordovician and Devonian intrusives invaded the metamorphic units. Late Cambrian to Early Ordovician (Famatinian) back-arc mafic to ultramafic rocks and islandarc amphibolites are located in the Pringles Metamorphic Complex associated with granulite facies metasedimentary rocks (Sims et al 1997;Hauzenberger et al 2001). During the last three decades, a large number of studies have focused on the structural evolution, metamorphism and magmatism of the basement complexes in the Sierra de San Luis (Kilmurray and Dalla Salda 1977;López de Luchi 1986, 1987Ortiz Suárez et al 1992;Llambías et al 1998;Sims et al 1998;von Gosen and Prozzi 1998;Delpino et al 2001Delpino et al , 2007González et al 2002;López de Luchi et al 2003Steenken et al 2004Steenken et al , 2006Steenken et al , 2008.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation suggests that, although the metapyroxenite and metagabbros shared a common PeT metamorphic history, their pervasive reequilibration occurred at different PeT conditions along their retrograde PeT path. Hauzenberger et al (2001) proposed that mafic intrusions of the Sierras de San Luis are responsible for granulite facies metamorphism developed at 740e790 C and 0.57e0.64 GPa. According to Zaffarana et al (2011) the mafic intrusions alone could not have caused the thermal input responsible for the increase of the metamorphic grade from amphibolite to granulite facies conditions in neighbouring rocks.…”
Section: Pet Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10, pag. 171) mylonites of the Pringles Metamorphic Complex adjacent to mafic rocks (Hauzenberger et al, 2001) at Las Aguilas-El Fierro underwent four (T 1 , T 2 , T 3 , T 4 ) tectonometamorphic events and a counterclockwise PeTed path. According to Delpino et al (2007), the T 1 and T 2 events developed with increasing temperature and pressure conditions under extensional and compressional regimes, respectively.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%