2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00076-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metamodeling: Radial basis functions, versus polynomials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
97
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…49 Parametric techniques approximate the functions with no prior knowledge about the underlying data; such techniques include polynomial models and Taguchi models. Non-parametric techniques have an a priori set of functions which are used to derive an approximate function based on observed responses.…”
Section: Review Of Metamodelling: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49 Parametric techniques approximate the functions with no prior knowledge about the underlying data; such techniques include polynomial models and Taguchi models. Non-parametric techniques have an a priori set of functions which are used to derive an approximate function based on observed responses.…”
Section: Review Of Metamodelling: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, using a stochastic kriging metamodel can support both continuous and discrete-valued decision variables. Hussain et al (2002) used radial basis function as the metamodel, which is typically less computationally demanding than kriging. Another type of metamodel is neural networks (Laguna and Marti, 2002).…”
Section: Meta-model Based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An RSM based on a radial basis function (RBF) was used to develop statistical surrogate models of the ATD responses with respect to the restraint conditions for each ATD/crash condition. An RBF-based RSM has been widely discussed and applied in building the surrogate models and helping conduct complex optimization analysis (Hussain et al 2002;McDonald et al 2007;Zhou et al 2016). In the current study, the ATD responses included the head injury criterion (HIC), neck tension, neck compression, chest 3-ms clip, chest deflection, and left and right femur forces.…”
Section: Response Surface Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%