Metamemory and memory test performance in stroke patients

Aben, Laurien; Kessel, M.A. van; Duivenvoorden, Hugo J.; Busschbach, Jan J. V.; Eling, Paul; Bogert, M.A.; Ribbers, Gerard M.

doi:10.1080/09602010902754185

Cited by 15 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Three studies used informant-based methods to assess cognitive skills, where patients (47,48) and family members (49) were used as informants. All studies used a pen-and-paper reference standard for validation and excluded patients with aphasia.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Cognition after Stroke. Who Misses Out? A Systematic Review

Wall

Isaacs

Copland

et al. 2015

International Journal of Stroke

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Cognition after Stroke. Who Misses Out? A Systematic Review

Wall

Isaacs

Copland

et al. 2015

International Journal of Stroke

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…MSE has hardly been studied in stroke patients [23,24,25]. If the same relationships found in healthy elderly could also be found in patients who have suffered a stroke, MSE may become a target in the treatment of stroke patients with memory complaints.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Memory Complaints in Chronic Stroke Patients Are Predicted by Memory Self-Efficacy rather than Memory Capacity

Aben

Ponds²,

Heijenbrok‐Kal

et al. 2011

Cerebrovasc Dis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Memory self-efficacy (MSE) is the belief about one’s mastery of memory functioning. In healthy elderly, memory complaints are related to MSE rather than to objectively measured memory capacity. MSE has scarcely been studied in patients that suffered a stroke. The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to examine whether memory capacity and MSE can predict the presence of memory complaints in stroke patients, and (2) to study which variables are the best predictors of MSE. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 136 stroke patients (>18 months after onset) were recruited from April 2008 to November 2009. MSE was measured using the Metamemory in Adulthood questionnaire. Depression, coping and personality were measured using validated questionnaires, and memory performance was measured using the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test (RBMT) and the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT). Patients were divided into a ‘complaints’ and a ‘no complaints’ group. Results: A lower MSE score was an independent predictor of having memory complaints (adjusted odds ratio: 0.422; p = 0.000), adjusted for age and depression. The RBMT and AVLT scores did not predict the presence of memory complaints (p > 0.263). Presence of memory complaints and depression were the strongest predictors of MSE (B = –1.748, p = 0.000; B = –0.054, p = 0.000), followed by word fluency, not having a partner and side of stroke (B = 0.038, p = 0.012; B = –0.517, p = 0.082; B = –0.479, p = 0.088). Conclusions: Memory complaints are predicted by MSE rather than memory capacity. MSE memory training might be an effective training strategy for reducing memory complaints in selected chronic stroke patients.

show abstract

“…Seven studies did not define the term 2 30–32 42 44 47. Sixteen studies made reference to a theoretical framework or model to describe a component of metacognition 5 6 20 29 33 34 37 40 46–48 50 51 53 54 58. The main theoretical framework discussed was Crosson et al 's three-level model of self-awareness.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Metacognitive function poststroke: a review of definition and assessment

Banna

Redha

Abdulla

et al. 2015

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Metacognition is the conscious knowledge individuals have about their own cognitive capacities and the regulation of these activities through self-monitoring. The aim of this review was to identify the definitions and assessment tools used to examine metacognition in relation to stroke studies. A computer database search was conducted using MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Reviews, Scopus and Web of Science. A total of 1412 publications were retrieved from the initial database search. Following the removal of unrelated articles, 34 articles remained eligible. 5 studies examined metacognition in relation to cognitive and/or emotional functioning, 4 examined the concept in relation to memory, while others investigated its relationship to driving, employment or restrictions in daily living. 12 studies examined metacognitive function exclusively in stroke. Only 1 study examined metacognition in the acute phase of stroke. 7 studies adhered to the standard definition of metacognition in line with the neuropsychological literature. The main assessment tools utilised included the Self-Regulation and Skills Interview (SRSI), the Self-Awareness of Deficits Interview (SADI), the Awareness Questionnaire (AQ) and the Patient Competency Rating Scale (PCRS). Assessment of metacognition has tended to focus on traumatic and other acquired brain injury in comparison to stroke. The majority of the studies that examined metacognition in stroke did not assess patients in the acute phase. The heterogeneity of assessment tools was in keeping with the variation in the definition of metacognition. The emergence of a standard metacognitive assessment tool may have important implications for future rehabilitative programmes.

show abstract

Metamemory and memory test performance in stroke patients

Cited by 15 publications

References 39 publications

Assessing Cognition after Stroke. Who Misses Out? A Systematic Review

Assessing Cognition after Stroke. Who Misses Out? A Systematic Review

Memory Complaints in Chronic Stroke Patients Are Predicted by Memory Self-Efficacy rather than Memory Capacity

Metacognitive function poststroke: a review of definition and assessment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About