1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf02027032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metals in soft tissues of mule deer and antelope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Serum copper, zinc, and most serum iron concentrations fell within published suggested adequate ranges of 0.60-1.30 mg/L for copper, 0.50-1.00 mg/L for zinc, and 1.52-2.77 mg/L for iron, 27 whereas some serum iron values exceeded this range. Although 3 out of 15 (20%) coastal and southern California deer and 12 out of 40 (30%) Sierra Nevada and Sierra foothills deer had liver copper values categorized as "deficient" when using the ranges suggested by studies on red deer (<4 mg/kg wet weight = deficient, 4-6 mg/kg = marginal, and >6 mg/kg = adequate), 35 the ranges observed were comparable to reports of mule deer in Colorado, 30,36 Montana, 23 and South Dakota. 37 A total of 8 deer could be categorized as deficient for both selenium and copper based on liver concentrations; 6 from the Sierra Nevada, and 2 from southern California.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Serum copper, zinc, and most serum iron concentrations fell within published suggested adequate ranges of 0.60-1.30 mg/L for copper, 0.50-1.00 mg/L for zinc, and 1.52-2.77 mg/L for iron, 27 whereas some serum iron values exceeded this range. Although 3 out of 15 (20%) coastal and southern California deer and 12 out of 40 (30%) Sierra Nevada and Sierra foothills deer had liver copper values categorized as "deficient" when using the ranges suggested by studies on red deer (<4 mg/kg wet weight = deficient, 4-6 mg/kg = marginal, and >6 mg/kg = adequate), 35 the ranges observed were comparable to reports of mule deer in Colorado, 30,36 Montana, 23 and South Dakota. 37 A total of 8 deer could be categorized as deficient for both selenium and copper based on liver concentrations; 6 from the Sierra Nevada, and 2 from southern California.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Liver zinc, manganese, and most liver iron concentrations fell within published suggested reference ranges (30-110 mg/kg wet weight for zinc, 3.00-3.40 mg/kg for manganese, and 120-300 mg/kg for iron). 27 The concentrations were similar to the ranges detected in mule deer in South Dakota, Montana, or Colorado, 23,36,37 although especially in the Sierra Nevada areas, some iron values exceeded the suggested reference range and the median values were higher than what was detected in other studies. 28,29 No prior information is available on hair trace mineral concentrations in California deer, but the body hair selenium concentrations were comparable to a Washington study that measured body hair selenium in 10 mule deer (mean = 0.150 mg/kg, range = 0.01-0.314 mg/kg).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Liver molybdenum concentrations in our sample averaged 1.9 ppm (s 50.54, n5292), falling between mean values reported for adult mule deer from the Piceance Basin in northwestern Colorado (1.3 ppm, s50.7, n512; Stelter, 1980) and the southern Black Hills (3.4 ppm converted dry weight, SE50.1; Zimmerman et al, 2008). Liver manganese concentrations averaged 8.5 ppm (s 52.4, n5356) among the deer we sampled, compared to 9.4 ppm (s52.5, n529) among Montana mule deer (Munshower and Neuman, 1979) and 12.4 ppm (converted dry weight; SE50.4) among Black Hills mule deer (Zimmerman et al, 2008). ''Normal'' tissue concentrations of copper and other trace mineral concentrations seem to vary widely within and among mule deer populations over both small and large geographic scales.…”
mentioning
confidence: 44%
“…per concentrations among ''normal'' adult female mule deer and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) from the southern Black Hills were about three times higher than mean liver copper concentrations among mule deer from Montana (46.3 ppm,s529.1, n529; Munshower and Neuman, 1979) or white-tailed deer from Texas (54 ppm converted dry weight, SE521; King et al, 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Lichens and mosses, for example, belong to susceptible bio-indicators of environmental pollution by heavy metals [48-51]. Moreover, the Reindeer are trophic specialists preferring this feed [52,53]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%