1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-3276(08)60350-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metals in Biology: An Attempt at Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lowest values refer to states obtained by feeding electrons into the IT* ligand orbitals of the complex with n = + 2. From comparison with earlier results [3] iron is expected to keep the character of Fe(I1) in these states. The two states with slightly higher energy are obtained by addition of electrons to the IT* ligand orbitals of the complex with n = + 3.…”
Section: Iron Complexes Of Standard Geometrysupporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The lowest values refer to states obtained by feeding electrons into the IT* ligand orbitals of the complex with n = + 2. From comparison with earlier results [3] iron is expected to keep the character of Fe(I1) in these states. The two states with slightly higher energy are obtained by addition of electrons to the IT* ligand orbitals of the complex with n = + 3.…”
Section: Iron Complexes Of Standard Geometrysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In the earlier investigations [3] the choice of electron configuration for different values of the overall charge n did not present any problem. For all different combinations of ligating atoms X and metals Be, Mg, Ni, Cu, and Zn the electron configuration for n = + 2 turned out to be the one to be expected from a combination of the metal + 2 ion and two neutral bidentate ligands.…”
Section: Iron Complexes Of Standard Geometrymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The electron affinity of the neutral atom was assumed to be equal to -1.54 eV, the value reported for Hg, another d10s2 atom (Lange, 1973 in Fischer-Hjalmars and Henriksson-Enflo, 1982). The net charge on the Me3S5 cluster, taking into account the charge on the cysteine C0 atoms, was -2.81, which is close to the expected charge of a complex formed from three bivalent metal ions and nine thiolate ligands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%