2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40898-016-0001-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metals for bone implants: safety, design, and efficacy

Abstract: Like most bone deficits, mandibular segmental defects may result from surgical reconstruction due to congenital deformity, tumor resection, other pathologies, senescence, trauma, or infection. The goals of mandibular reconstruction are to restore the mandible's function and normal appearance. Clinical methods to restore the mandible typically rely on bone replacement using some combination of bone tissue transfer and metal implants. This paper reviews the safety, design, and efficacy of metal implants in gener… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, these metals show good biocompatibility because of the non-toxic nature of released ions and sufficient strength to support bone tissue ingrowth ( Heiden et al, 2015 ; Prasad et al, 2017 ). Among these biodegradable metals, Mg is particularly interesting; in fact, it shows high tensile strength, relatively low Young’s elastic modulus and relatively low density compared to other metals, and similar properties to that of cortical bone, potentially reducing stress shielding related risks, typical of titanium (Ti) and other high-strength metals ( Shayesteh Moghaddam et al, 2016 ; Prasad et al, 2017 ; Zhao et al, 2017 ; Minnath, 2018 ). Thanks to these mechanical properties, Mg is mostly used to build bone fixation devices (e.g., pins, screws, rods and plates) and more recently, load-bearing devices in combination with other metals such as SSt or Ti.…”
Section: Biomaterials For Bone Tissue Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Generally, these metals show good biocompatibility because of the non-toxic nature of released ions and sufficient strength to support bone tissue ingrowth ( Heiden et al, 2015 ; Prasad et al, 2017 ). Among these biodegradable metals, Mg is particularly interesting; in fact, it shows high tensile strength, relatively low Young’s elastic modulus and relatively low density compared to other metals, and similar properties to that of cortical bone, potentially reducing stress shielding related risks, typical of titanium (Ti) and other high-strength metals ( Shayesteh Moghaddam et al, 2016 ; Prasad et al, 2017 ; Zhao et al, 2017 ; Minnath, 2018 ). Thanks to these mechanical properties, Mg is mostly used to build bone fixation devices (e.g., pins, screws, rods and plates) and more recently, load-bearing devices in combination with other metals such as SSt or Ti.…”
Section: Biomaterials For Bone Tissue Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to these mechanical properties, Mg is mostly used to build bone fixation devices (e.g., pins, screws, rods and plates) and more recently, load-bearing devices in combination with other metals such as SSt or Ti. The degradation kinetics of Mg implants can be adjusted through the development of alloys with other non-toxic elements, like calcium (Ca) and zirconium (Zr), or by way of mechanical and chemical surface treatments ( Shayesteh Moghaddam et al, 2016 ; Prasad et al, 2017 ; Zhao et al, 2017 ; Minnath, 2018 ; Bordbar-Khiabani et al, 2019 ). The released Mg 2+ ions positively stimulate osteoblasts and other bone cells activities and proliferation, being beneficial for new bone tissue development and implant fate ( Zhao et al, 2017 ; Ghosh et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Biomaterials For Bone Tissue Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Metal implants [24,25], especially titanium-based implants, have taken the major share of the implant market. Owing to the ease of manufacture and relatively low costs they are the number one choice for dental and orthopedic applications, with new advancements being constantly brought to light [25,26].…”
Section: Metal-based Implantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PEEK suffers in this category, as it is a neutral hydrophobic inert polymer with no native motifs for cell binding and growth. (Toth 2012) This is in contrast to typical metal-based implants that have a native surface charge that allows for cell and protein deposition and growth (Shayesteh Moghaddam et al 2016;Gao et al 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%