1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01033409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metals biosorption by sodium alginate immobilizedChlorella homosphaera cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison with the adsorption capacities of the free biomass (see Figure 2b) shows that there was little or no loss of biomass efficiency caused by the immobilisation process. These results are consistent with those of Kuhn and Pfister (1989) and da Costa and Leite (1991) and confii that alginate entrapment does not decrease biomass adsorption capacity. This has been attributed to the very high porosity of the alginate matrix and the open lattice structure which allows metals or large molecules to penetrate to the immobilised cells [Smidsrod and Stjak-Braek, 19901 and is supported by the micrograph of the alginate biosorbent shown in Plate B, Figure 1.…”
Section: Electron Micrographssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…A comparison with the adsorption capacities of the free biomass (see Figure 2b) shows that there was little or no loss of biomass efficiency caused by the immobilisation process. These results are consistent with those of Kuhn and Pfister (1989) and da Costa and Leite (1991) and confii that alginate entrapment does not decrease biomass adsorption capacity. This has been attributed to the very high porosity of the alginate matrix and the open lattice structure which allows metals or large molecules to penetrate to the immobilised cells [Smidsrod and Stjak-Braek, 19901 and is supported by the micrograph of the alginate biosorbent shown in Plate B, Figure 1.…”
Section: Electron Micrographssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Most studies of biosorption for metal removal have involved the use of either laboratory-grown microorganism or biomass generated by the pharmacology and food processing industries or wastewater treatment units (Tsezos and Volesky, 1981;Townsley et al 1986;Rome and Gadd, 1987;Macaskie, 1990;Costa and Leite, 1991;Rao et al 1993). Many aquatic microorganisms, such as bacteria, yeast and algae can take up dissolved metals from their surroundings onto their bodies and can be used for removing heavy metal ions successfully (Asku et al 1991).…”
Section: *Corresponding Authormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first 45 min, the biosorption uptake was rapid (43.7-79.6%), then it proceeds at a slower sorption rate and finally did not increase significantly up to 120 min. In the initial stages the removal efficiency of Cr(VI) at all concentrations increased rapidly due to the abundant availability of active binding sites on the biomass, and with gradual occupancy of these sites, the sorption became less efficient in the later stages (Costa and Leite, 1991). In fact, the biosorption kinetics of heavy metal ions consisted of two phases; an initial rapid phase where the biosorption was rapid and contributed significantly to the equilibrium biosorption, and a slower second phase whose contribution to the total metal biosorption was relatively small.…”
Section: Effect Of Contact Time and Initial Concentration Of Chromiummentioning
confidence: 99%